What is the force work done by force F along OAC, OBC, OC

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the work done by a non-conservative force F=(2yi + x^2j) N as a particle moves through specified paths in the xy-plane. The work is determined using the integral W = ∫ F · dr, with specific evaluations along paths OAC, OBC, and OC. The results show that the work done varies depending on the trajectory taken, confirming that the force is non-conservative, as it does not satisfy the condition ∮ F · ds = 0. The calculated work along path OBC is 50 Joules, while work along path OB is zero due to the constant x value.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector calculus and line integrals
  • Familiarity with conservative and non-conservative forces
  • Knowledge of the work-energy principle
  • Ability to perform integration in multiple dimensions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of conservative forces and their properties
  • Learn about line integrals in vector calculus
  • Explore applications of the work-energy theorem in physics
  • Investigate examples of non-conservative forces in real-world scenarios
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those studying mechanics, as well as educators looking to enhance their understanding of work done by forces in different paths.

UrbanXrisis
Messages
1,192
Reaction score
1
B ------C (5,5)
..|.../|
..|.../..|
O|/___|A

A force acting on a particle moving in the xy plane is given by F=(2yi + x^2j) N, where x and y are in meters. THe particle moves from the origin to a position having coordinates x=5.00m and y=5.00m.

What is the force work done by force F along OAC, OBC, OC.

The answer books shows different answer. Woudln't the work just be mgh for all of them? Obvioulsy not, how would I solve this problem?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
By the definition of Work

W = \int \vec{F } \cdot d \vec{r}
 
the integral of F=(2yi + x^2j) is

F=y^2+.3x^3

so W=(y^2+.3x^3)

however, (x,y) is always 5,5, there isn't a change in work
 
No, that's not true, for the first case you must evaluate from O to B, then from B to C and add both works for the OBC path.
 
that doesn't seem to get me any new answers.

O-->(0,5)B-->(5,0)C is W=(0^2+.3(5)^3)+(5^2+.3(0)^3)

which equals (5^2+.3(5)^3)=66.6

how is it possible to get different numbers?
 
Because that force is not conservative, it depends on the trajectory.

This means that the work done by the particle on a closed circuit or on a path from 1 to 2 and then 2 to 1 depends on the trajectory is not equal to 0, thus the force is not conservative.

The following condition is not met:

\oint \vec{F} \cdot d \vec{s} = 0
 
I don't understand how the force can be different. Do you have an example?
 
UrbanXrisis said:
that doesn't seem to get me any new answers.

O-->(0,5)B-->(5,0)C is W=(0^2+.3(5)^3)+(5^2+.3(0)^3)

which equals (5^2+.3(5)^3)=66.6

how is it possible to get different numbers?

What do you mean not getting different answers?

Probably your limits are wrong.

For example for the OBC Path

You first find the work from OB which means to Integrate from 0 to 5 with a differential dy

W_{ob} = \int_{0}^{5} (2y \hat{i} + x^2 \hat{j}) \cdot dy \hat_{j} = \int_{0}^{5} x^2 dy = 0

because x = 0 along this path

Now BC

W_{bc} = \int_{0}^{5} (2y \hat{i} + x^2 \hat{j}) \cdot dx \hat_{i} = \int_{0}^{5} 2y dx = 50

because y = 5

The work along OBC is 50 Joules.
 
Last edited:
why is OB=0? there is a change in height.
 
  • #10
Because x = 0 and is considered a constant in the integral, what is considered a variable is what the differential tell us.

W_{ob} = x^2 \int_{0}^{5} dy

Also Remember:

\hat{i} \cdot \hat{j} = \hat{i} \cdot \hat{k} = \hat{j} \cdot \hat{k} = 0
 
Last edited:
  • #11
for:
W_{ob} = \int_{0}^{5} (2y \hat{i} + x^2 \hat{j}) dy \hat_{j} = \int_{0}^{5} x^2 dy = 0

why was the y value disregarded?

for:
W_{bc} = \int_{0}^{5} (2y \hat{i} + x^2 \hat{j}) dx \hat_{i} = \int_{0}^{5} 2y dx = 50

how does:
\int_{0}^{5} 2y dx = 50
when
\int_{0}^{5} 2y dx =y^2 = 25
 
  • #12
It was disregarded because of

\hat{i} \cdot \hat{j} = \hat{i} \cdot \hat{k} = \hat{j} \cdot \hat{k} = 0

and read above
 
  • #13
I'm sorry but I have no idea what that means

Is there another way to approach this without integrals?
 
  • #14
Not that i know of, urban.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K