What is the formula for calculating the sum of ceiling values for two integers?

  • Thread starter Thread starter rayukpant
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the sum of ceiling values for two integers 'n' and 'm', the formula is ceiling[(n+m)/2] + ceiling[(n-m+1)/2]. The discussion emphasizes analyzing two cases based on the parity of 'n' and 'm': both integers having the same parity (either both even or both odd) or having different parities (one odd, one even). In both scenarios, the ceilings can be explicitly determined, leading to a clearer evaluation of the sum. It is noted that the sum or difference of two even numbers or two odd numbers is even, while the sum or difference of one odd and one even number is also even. A key takeaway is that in any case, one of the expressions results in an integer while the other results in a half-integer.
rayukpant
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
For integers 'n' and 'm', find the value of ceiling[(n+m)/2] + ceiling[(n-m+1)/2].
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Consider the two cases separately, of
1. Either both even or both odd and
2. One odd the other even.
 
Just split it into cases.

Either
(1) m and n have the same parity (either both odd or both even); or
(2) m and n have different parities (one odd and the other even).

In both cases, you can explicitly find the ceilings in question.
 
can you please tell me more in detail as to how to consider those two separately with even and odd parities
 
How can you express an even integer? Odd integer? Once you have expressions for each, go through each case and plug them in. After you do this, you can evaluate explicitly what the answer is.
 
The sum of difference of two even numbers is even, the sum or difference of two odd numbers is even. The sum or difference of one odd and one even number is even. Fit those into your formula. The crucial point is that in any case one of (n+m)/2 and (n- m+ 1)/2 is an integer and the other is a half integer.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top