What Is the Identity of Metal M in M(ClO)2 Based on Iodometric Titration Data?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jesse1256
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Redox
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on determining the identity of metal M in the compound M(ClO)2 through iodometric titration data. The titration involves dissolving the metal hypochlorite salt in sulfuric acid, reacting it with KI, and titrating with Na2S2O3, where the hypochlorite ion reacts completely while the metal ion remains unreactive. The calculated moles of Na2S2O3 used in the titration are 0.001569 mol, which can be used to derive the moles of ClO- present and subsequently the molar mass of metal M. Participants emphasize the importance of stoichiometry in solving the problem and suggest focusing on the relationship between moles rather than relying solely on equations. The discussion highlights the need for clarity in setting up stoichiometric equations to find the unknown metal's identity.
jesse1256
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Redox Titrations Bleach! help!

Homework Statement


An unknown metal hypochlorite salt, M(ClO)2, is subjected to analysis by iodometric titration: the salt is dissolved in dilute sulfuric acid, treated with excess aqueous KI, and then titrated with Na2S2O3 in the same manner as your experiment. The unknown metal ion (M2+) is completely unreactive in the titration. However, all of hypochlorite ion bondd to the metal reacts completely with Na2S2O3. Iodemetric titration of an acidified 0.0499 g sample of M(ClO)2 required 28.42 ml of 0.05521 mol/L Na2S2O3 to reach the equivalence point. What is the identity of metal M?

Homework Equations


IO3^- + 5I^- + 6H^+ → 3I2 + 3H20
I2 + 2S2O3^2- → 2I^- + S4O6^2-
ClO^- + 2I^- + 2H^+ → I2 + Cl^- + H20

The Attempt at a Solution


So far all I have is the number of moles for Na2S2O3 = 0.001569 mol
I have no idea where to go from there! please help

ALSO one more question

Homework Statement


A sample of Au(ClO)3 is contaminated with LiClO. An acidified 0.2000 g sample of this mixture is treated with excess sodium iodide and subjected to iodometric titration. The sample requires 48.24 mL of 0.08893 mol/L Na2S2O3 to reach the equivalence point. Assuming that the Au^3+ and Li^+ ions are unreactive during the titration, determine the mass percent of LiClO in the sample.

Homework Equations



All the equations used in the first question!

The Attempt at a Solution


Only moles so far. =0.004289 molPleae help. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org


jesse1256 said:
So far all I have is the number of moles for Na2S2O3 = 0.001569 mol

User stoichiometry to find out how many moles of ClO- were present in the sample of the given mass, then use this information to find out molar mass of the metal.
 


okay that sounds easy enough, I think the main problem I have is not knowing what equation to use. Or do I set up my own stoichiometric equation adding M(ClO)2. and if I do, how do I go about doing that? Thanks!
 


Forget about using "equations", think about it as just another stoichiometry problem.

All titrations are nothing more but a simple stoichiometry. You know moles of this, you have to calculate corresponding moles of the other.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Back
Top