What is the Identity of the Unknown Liquid Used in a Dumas Bulb Experiment?

  • Thread starter Thread starter yellowcakepie
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Identity Liquid
AI Thread Summary
The laboratory experiment using a Dumas bulb aimed to determine the molar mass of an unknown clear liquid, resulting in a mean value of 38.1 g/mol with a significant confidence interval due to a trial error. The liquid is safe to inhale in vapor form, lacks a distinct smell, and has a boiling point below 100 degrees Celsius. The experimenter is considering whether the liquid is ethanol or methanol, noting concerns about methanol's toxicity in vapor form. However, some participants argue that methanol is not significantly more dangerous than other solvents when simply inhaled. The discussion highlights the need for further identification of the liquid based on its properties.
yellowcakepie
I performed a laboratory experiment using a Dumas bulb to find the molar mass of an unknown, clear liquid in order to identify it. The Dumas bulb was submerged in a beaker filled with water (with the tip out of the water) and the water was boiled to evaporate the sample.

I eventually got a result with 38.1 g/mol as the mean, with a huge confidence interval (at 95%) of +- 18.1 g/mol. This is because I screwed up my 3rd trial so I could only use my first 2. I got results of 36.72, 39.56, and 49.11 g/mol.

I need help identifying this liquid.

The liquid is clear, safe to inhale in vapor form (I'm still alive), does not have a distinct smell, has a boiling point lower than 100 degrees C, and is not "an exotic compound".

Edit: I'm now deciding between ethanol and methanol. I'm hearing that methanol is poisonous in vapor form, so I think it may be ethanol.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
This appears to be lab homework, so moving the thread to homework section. No template.
 
yellowcakepie said:
does not have a distinct smell

I'm now deciding between ethanol and methanol. I'm hearing that methanol is poisonous in vapor form, so I think it may be ethanol.

These alcohols do have a quite characteristic smell.
 
Methanol isn’t really any more poisonous than other common solvents. Of course, like most common solvents, if you drink it, that’s bad news, but simply smelling it is very unlikely to hurt you.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top