What is the impact of long-term storage on sealed lead acid batteries?

AI Thread Summary
Long-term storage of sealed lead acid batteries can significantly impact their performance, especially if they have been allowed to discharge completely, leading to sulfation of the electrodes. If the batteries have retained over 30% charge or received occasional trickle charging, they may still be in good condition. However, batteries stored for five years without maintenance are likely to have lost most of their charge, particularly if stored in poor conditions. While some users report satisfaction with similar batteries purchased at a discount, caution is advised as the actual performance may not meet expectations. Ultimately, it is important to assess immediate needs before purchasing, as unused batteries may become obsolete over time.
I_am_learning
Messages
681
Reaction score
16
I am offered Sealed Lead acid batteries at heavy discount (half the price) at local Sale. But they were manufactured some 5 years back.
How much damage does long storage do to them?
They have never been touched. Just bought 5 years back, and stored.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Be careful, if they've been allowed to go flat then they may be good for nothing but scrap metal. When lead acid batteries are allowed to sit in a discharged state the electrodes "sulphate up" and they're rarely of much good for anything afterwards.

If however they've retained more than about 30% charge (or have had a trickle charge every now and then) then they could be in good condition. Without any more details it could be a bit of a lottery.
 
That is good info, I have no idea.
 
uart said:
Be careful, if they've been allowed to go flat then they may be good for nothing but scrap metal. When lead acid batteries are allowed to sit in a discharged state the electrodes "sulphate up" and they're rarely of much good for anything afterwards.

If however they've retained more than about 30% charge (or have had a trickle charge every now and then) then they could be in good condition. Without any more details it could be a bit of a lottery.

They are still in their seal. Never Touched, so never trickle charged or anything.
Assuming, initially fully charged at manufacture and most optimistic self-Discharge of 3% per month, the charge left after 5 years is 0.97^(5*12) = 0.16 = 16%.
Because the battery were stored in not so good temperature, it should have much lower charge than that.
(But do self-Discharge rate remain the same or they acceleratre/deccelerate?)

Anyway, I now think they aren't the best bet.
But, I have heard somewhere that you can recover from sulphation by heavy bench charging or the like.

Also, the sale has been open for an year now, and rumor has been around that those who purchased the battery at the beginning are pretty happy with it till now. However I doubt that they don't have enough knowledge to decide whether the battery works as per its nameplate rating.
Actually they are selling at 1/3 rd the market price.
 
Well the non electronics side is whether you have any need of one? Can you find one that fit into your car? If not, I won't get it. You are looking at the price, but if you don't have particular immediately use of it, it will be sitting for another few years and you'll be selling it at 10 years old and that would be bad!

Don't just look at the price that you cannot refuse. AND this is not from knowledge of electronics....This is learned from my wife and my own mistake:bugeye:. I used to love Smucker's orange and Strawberry preserve. Two years ago they had a big sale for $2 each and was a very very good price. I bought like 30 of each. I ate, and I ate and I ate...and ate! Till the point I was so sick and tired of them! I still have like 25 bottles, they just pass the expiration date!:cry: Only stock up on stuffs that has no expiration date.

The lesson learned is only get what you need plus one if you have use of it.
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top