What is the inverse of f(x) = x + [x]?

  • Thread starter Thread starter p3forlife
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inverse
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on finding the inverse of the function f(x) = x + [x], where [x] denotes the greatest integer function. It is established that there is no inverse for this function due to its non-injective nature, specifically because certain values in the range cannot be achieved, such as f(x) = 1.5. The proposed inverse function is f-1(y) = y - (⌊y⌋/2), applicable only when ⌊y⌋ is even. Additionally, the user seeks the inverse of f(x) = x/(1-x²) for -1 ≤ x ≤ 1, confirming that it is one-to-one on this interval.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the greatest integer function, [x]
  • Knowledge of injective and non-injective functions
  • Familiarity with inverse functions and their properties
  • Basic calculus concepts, including function behavior and graphing
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of the greatest integer function and its implications on inverses
  • Study injective functions and conditions for their inverses to exist
  • Explore the concept of piecewise functions and their inverses
  • Learn about the function f(x) = x/(1-x²) and methods for finding its inverse
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying calculus or real analysis, and anyone interested in understanding inverse functions and the greatest integer function.

p3forlife
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
I'm having trouble finding the inverse of f(x) = x + [x]. I think it comes back to what is the inverse of the greatest integer function, [x]. I have graphed [x], and its inverse is the reflection along the y = x line, which appears to be similar, although the inverse graph is "vertical". Is there a name for this inverse graph? I have tried 1/[x], and [1/x], but those are not it. Also, I can't solve for the inverse by factoring out x.

If it isn't already too much, I can't seem to find the inverse of f(x) = x/(1-x^2)
for -1 <= x <=1 either, since I can't factor out the x. I have checked that this function is one-to-one on the interval, so it should be possible. Are there any suggestions?

Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is no inverse to x --> [x] due to its not being injective.
 
The problem is the holes in the range of f:\mathbb R \to \mathbb R with f:x\to x + \lceil x \rceil[/tex]. For example, there is no real x that yields f(x)=1.5.<br /> <br /> That said,<br /> <br /> f^{-1}(y)=&lt;br /&gt; y-\frac{\lfloor y \rfloor}2&lt;br /&gt;<br /> <br /> but only if \lfloor y \rfloor is even. The inverse function is undefined if \lfloor y \rfloor is odd.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K