What is the Last Term in the Expression for \nabla\cdot(\phi\vec{A})?

  • Thread starter Thread starter SAMSAM12
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Curl Grad
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
3 replies · 3K views
SAMSAM12
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


If [itex]\phi[/itex]= xy[itex]^{2}[/itex]
A=xzi-z[itex]^{2}[/itex]j+xy[itex]^{2}[/itex]k
B=zi+xj+yk

Verify that
[itex]\nabla[/itex].([itex]\phi[/itex]A)=A.[itex]\nabla[/itex][itex]\phi[/itex]+[itex]\phi[/itex].[itex]\nabla[/itex]A

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


I have worked out the first two parts of the question:
[itex]\phi[/itex]A = (x[itex]^{2}[/itex]y[itex]^{2}[/itex]z, -xy[itex]^{2}[/itex]z[itex]^{2}[/itex],x[itex]^{2}[/itex]y[itex]^{4}[/itex])
div([itex]\phi[/itex]A) = 2xy[itex]^{2}[/itex]z-2xyz[itex]^{2}[/itex]

A.grad([itex]\phi[/itex]) = (xy[itex]^{2}[/itex]z-2xyz[itex]^{2}[/itex])

I'm struggling to work out the last part:
[itex]\phi[/itex].[itex]\nabla[/itex]A

I tried working out [itex]\phi[/itex].grad(A)? but the answer sheet has
div(A) = z
[itex]\phi[/itex]div(A) = xy[itex]^{2}[/itex]z

why?
Any help appreciated.

Merry Christmas and Happy new year
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ok, so to start compute [itex]\nabla A[/itex] which will just be [itex](\frac{\partial}{\partial x}\vec{A},\frac{\partial}{\partial y}\vec{A},\frac{\partial}{\partial z}\vec{A})[/itex]
You will end up with a scalar, which you can multiply by your scalar [itex]\phi[/itex] and you should end up with [itex]xy^2z[/itex].
 
Last edited:
SAMSAM12 said:

Homework Statement


If [itex]\phi[/itex]= xy[itex]^{2}[/itex]
A=xzi-z[itex]^{2}[/itex]j+xy[itex]^{2}[/itex]k
B=zi+xj+yk

Verify that
[itex]\nabla[/itex].([itex]\phi[/itex]A)=A.[itex]\nabla[/itex][itex]\phi[/itex]+[itex]\phi[/itex].[itex]\nabla[/itex]A
The last term of the expression doesn't make sense. You can't dot a scalar into anything. It should be
$$\nabla\cdot(\phi \vec{A}) = \vec{A}\cdot\nabla \phi + \phi\nabla\cdot\vec{A}$$
 
vela said:
The last term of the expression doesn't make sense. You can't dot a scalar into anything. It should be
$$\nabla\cdot(\phi \vec{A}) = \vec{A}\cdot\nabla \phi + \phi\nabla\cdot\vec{A}$$

Thank you.