What is the linear thermal coefficient of expansion for the container?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The linear thermal coefficient of expansion for a container filled with mercury can be determined using the relationship between volumetric and linear expansion coefficients. In this case, the initial volume of mercury is 1.35 L, and upon heating from 20°C to 60°C, 7.4 mL spills over, indicating that the container must expand to accommodate the additional volume. The correct approach involves calculating the volume increase of the mercury (approximately 10 mL) and the difference (2.6 mL) that the container must account for. The final calculation yields a linear thermal expansion coefficient of approximately 0.000016 K-1.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of thermal expansion concepts
  • Familiarity with volumetric and linear expansion coefficients
  • Basic algebra for manipulating equations
  • Knowledge of temperature scales (Celsius and Kelvin)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the relationship between volumetric and linear thermal expansion coefficients
  • Learn about the properties of mercury and its thermal expansion characteristics
  • Explore practical applications of thermal expansion in engineering materials
  • Review examples of thermal expansion problems involving liquids and solids
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics or engineering, materials scientists, and anyone interested in the principles of thermal expansion and its applications in real-world scenarios.

wildrjetta
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I have tried this question 6 times (getting the same answer more than once) and am still not getting the correct answer. I think I need some help understanding where I'm going wrong.

The question: A container is filled to the brim with 1.35 L of mercury at 20°C. When the temperature of container and mercury is raised to 60°C, 7.4 mL of mercury spill over the brim of the container. Determine the linear expansion coefficient of the container.

I have tried using the equation, (delta V/Vo) = 3 (alpha) (delta T), knowing that Beta=3(alpha) for the relationship between linear and volumetric expansion coefficients. I also know that the volume of mercury in the container doesn't decrease that much (1.35L --> 1.3426L) and that the temperature change is 40K (since degrees celsius and kelvin are the same scale). I am very frustrated with this problem and hope someone can help me see my error. :frown:

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not familiar with this but I want to know, why does the volume of mercury decrease with an increase in tempeture?
 
As far as I know, it doesn't. The volumetric thermal expansion coefficient for mercury at room temperature is about 1.8 * 10^(-4) /K. That makes the mercury in the container increase in volume by about 10 ml.
 
thank you for pointing that out, I don't know what I was thinking in my reasoning that the volume would decrease. Perhaps I had just been used to doing something similar in previous questions I had been working on prior to trying this one. Nonetheless, wouldn't I set the problem up with delta V = (7.4e-3L)/(V0=1.35L)(delta T=40k)? Thus I get an answer that needs to be divided by 3 to convert from the volumetric coefficient to the linear coefficient. My answer is 4.567...e-5 K^-1. I tried this as one of my answers and it was wrong. Am I making an incorrect assumption still? What am I missing in my logic here?
THank you to the two previous threads and any that may be able to help me out!
 
I'm doing this very roughly. I previously calculated that the mercury will expand by about 10 mL. But only 7.4 mL spills out. This means that the vessel must increase its volume by the difference = 2.6 mL (This is the logical step you are missing). Dividing this by the initial volume = 1350 mL, the fraction is about 0.2% or 0.002. Dividing this by 40 and then by 3 should give you the linear thermal coefficient of expansion of the material of the container. I get rougly 0.000016 /K.

Do this correctly using a calculator. You should get a number that isn't terribly far from what I got.
 

Similar threads

Replies
28
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
21K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K