Thermal Expansion: Volume vs. Linear - 0.11L Spilled

In summary, a one liter pot is completely filled with oil and is heated to 190 degrees Celsius. The linear coefficient of thermal expansion for oil is 0.68*10-3, while the coefficient for the pot is 2.4*10-5. When solving for how much oil was spilled over, the author think that it would be volume expansion, but it is actually linear expansion. The error is in the text when it says "linear coefficient" when it should have said "volume coefficient".
  • #1
Alex126
84
5

Homework Statement


A one-liter pot is completely filled with oil. Heat is applied to the pot&oil and the temperature rises from 15°C to 190°C. How much oil is spilled over?

The linear coefficient of thermal expansion for oil is 0.68*10-3; the one for the pot is 2.4*10-5

Homework Equations


Linear expansion = starting length * coefficient α * ΔTemperature
Volume expansion = starting volume * coefficient β * ΔT

Coefficient β = 3*α

The Attempt at a Solution


Since we're talking of a pot, and oil in the pot, I thought that we'd be dealing with volume expansion here. So I simply used the formulas, and got the wrong result (0.344 Liters).

Just as an attempt, I then tried doing the exercise with the linear expansion, and got the right (apparently, according to the book) result (0.11 Liters).

What's up with that? Shouldn't it be volume expansion here? The process I thought to be correct was as follows:

V = starting volume (1L)

Oil spilled = [Final oil volume] - [Final pot volume]
Final oil volume = V + volume expansion oil
Final pot volume = V + volume expansion pot
=> oil spilled = volume expansion oil - volume expansion pot

Volume expansion oil/pot = V * βoil/pot * (190-15)
β = 3α

So:
Volume expansion oil = 1*3*0.68*10-3*175 = 0.357
Volume expansion pot = 1*3*2.4*10-5*175 = 0.0126

=> oil spilled = 0.357-0.0126 = 0.344

If I were to "force" the right result (0.11), I would have to use a formula that reads this:

volume expansion = V * linear expansion coefficient * ΔT

Which doesn't make sense to me. So am I missing something, or am I right and the book authors made a mistake and the right answer is 0.344 after all? (Or maybe the error was in the text when they said "linear coefficient" when they actually meant "volume coefficient")
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Alex126 said:
(Or maybe the error was in the text when they said "linear coefficient" when they actually meant "volume coefficient")
I think that's the error.

Your thinking is correct. (Look up the coefficient of expansion for oil and check.)
 
  • Like
Likes Alex126
  • #3
Alright, thanks.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Back
Top