What is the macroscopic cross section for natural uranium to thermal neutrons?

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
6 replies · 3K views
Kirk Truax
Messages
9
Reaction score
2
Hey all,

Does anyone happen to know the value of ν∑f for natural uranium? Here ν is the average number of neutron released from fission and ∑f is the macroscopic fission cross section of uranium.

Kirk
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'll wager there's a CANDU reactor engineer aboard who knows.
.
 
Kirk Truax said:
Hey all,

Does anyone happen to know the value of ν∑f for natural uranium? Here ν is the average number of neutron released from fission and ∑f is the macroscopic fission cross section of uranium.

Kirk
Developing a value for ∑f depends on the atomic density, which depends on the form, e.g., elemental, alloy or ceramic. What form is one considering? The value of ν depends on neutron energy, and in a thermal spectrum, it will depend on U-235.
 
Astronuc said:
The value of ν depends on neutron energy,

Natural U being mostly this ,,
https://t2.lanl.gov/nis/data/endf/endfv-pdf/u238.pdf
upload_2017-5-24_8-44-58.png
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Kirk Truax
jim hardy said:
Yeah, but that's for fast neutrons. Fast neutrons from fission have a peak distribution around 1 MeV and the energy distribution falls off rapidly up to 10 MeV. With d+t fusion, one gets up to 14.1 MeV neutrons. To go higher, one pretty much needs 20+ MeV protons and spallation reactions.

The OP did mention whether he flux was thermal, epithermal or fast.
 
Astronuc said:
The OP didn't mention whether he flux was thermal, epithermal or fast.

Fixed it for you

old jim
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: CalcNerd and Astronuc
Astronuc said:
Yeah, but that's for fast neutrons. Fast neutrons from fission have a peak distribution around 1 MeV and the energy distribution falls off rapidly up to 10 MeV. With d+t fusion, one gets up to 14.1 MeV neutrons. To go higher, one pretty much needs 20+ MeV protons and spallation reactions.

The OP did mention whether he flux was thermal, epithermal or fast.
Hey guys,

You were right, I definitely did leave out that vital bit of information. I was simply looking for the macroscopic cross section for thermal neutrons. I was modeling a sub-critical pile with a large amount of graphite moderation. Turns out I was able to find a ν∑f for UO2 to thermal neutrons to be about 0.2274 cm^-1. This was from the good ole D&H tables.

Kirk
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Astronuc and jim hardy