What is the main cause of the Gyroscope Torque Confusion?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The main cause of gyroscope torque confusion stems from the misunderstanding of how torque affects spinning and non-spinning wheels. When a weight is applied to a non-spinning wheel, it tilts down due to net torque, while a spinning wheel experiences precession, rotating at a constant angular velocity. The key distinction lies in the angular momentum vector's orientation and the nature of the applied torque, which must be perpendicular to induce precession. This phenomenon is often counterintuitive, leading to frequent inquiries on platforms like Physics Forums.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of angular momentum and its vector representation
  • Familiarity with the concept of torque and its application in rotational dynamics
  • Basic knowledge of gyroscopic motion and precession
  • Ability to interpret physics discussions and academic resources
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the mathematical derivation of gyroscopic precession
  • Explore the relationship between torque and angular momentum in detail
  • Review the physics of non-inertial reference frames and their effects on motion
  • Examine visual aids and simulations that illustrate gyroscopic behavior
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators explaining gyroscopic principles, and anyone interested in the dynamics of rotating systems.

DocZaius
Messages
365
Reaction score
11
This is not a homework question, but from having read the rules in the following thread, it looks like this is more academic assistance than pure discussion:

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=414380

This should be done whether the problem is part of one's assigned coursework or just independent study. The reason for this is that the scientific and mathematical sections of Physics Forums are to be reserved for discussions and not academic assistance.

So anyhow, I am having real trouble with precession. I know that net torque is equal to the derivative of angular momentum with respect to time.

If you put a weight at a distance from the axis of a non-spinning wheel, it tilts down. If you do the same at a distance of a spinning wheel, it rotates at a constant angular velocity. Attached is a picture trying to illustrate my confusion.

I just can't understand why the same torque with the same dL/dt results in completely different looking phenomena. Of course I know that the initial conditions are different in each case. But I don't understand what it is about their differences that leads to any accelerating tilting gyroscope to a constantly spinning gyroscope. Any help would be appreciated. The Wikipedia page did not help me enough.
 

Attachments

  • precession confusion.jpg
    precession confusion.jpg
    18.5 KB · Views: 487
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi DocZaius! :smile:
DocZaius said:
If you put a weight at a distance from the axis of a non-spinning wheel, it tilts down. If you do the same at a distance of a spinning wheel, it rotates at a constant angular velocity.

I just can't understand why the same torque with the same dL/dt results in completely different looking phenomena.

Your terminology of "tilting down" is confusing you.

The wheel doesn't "tilt down", it rotates horizontally.

If the wheel is spinning, then its angular momentum vector is along its axis … generally at an angle below the horizontal … to make that vector rotate about a vertical axis, we need a perpendicular horizontal torque (similar to centripetal acceleration) … that torque is the horizontal (not "down" :wink:) torque from the weight, if the weight is the correct size. :smile:

(If the weight isn't the correct size, then the gyroscope will tilt more or less to compensate … the amount of tilt will depend on the ratio of the spin rate and the weight … if the spin rate is zero, no amount of tilt will compensate.)
 
DocZaius said:
[...] I am having real trouble with precession.

I just can't understand why the same torque with the same dL/dt results in completely different looking phenomena.

Yeah. it's counterintuitive.
You are not the only one; the question you ask is a recurrent one.

Let me refer you to an earlier discussion (by me) here on physicsforums:
A post from november 2010 about https://www.physicsforums.com/showpost.php?p=2992527&postcount=3". Illustrated with images. Just a qualitative discussion.

More detailed discussion (including math) is in the http://www.cleonis.nl/physics/phys256/gyroscope_physics.php" article on my website.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
5K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
12K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
20K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K