I What is the mass of all photons emitted in the universe?

AI Thread Summary
The total mass of all photons emitted since the Big Bang is effectively zero, as each photon has zero mass, and multiplying zero by any number still results in zero. However, discussions highlight the complexities of mass in relativity, where a collection of photons can exhibit non-zero mass under certain conditions. The estimated number of photons emitted translates to approximately 4 x 10^84, but this number does not equate to a meaningful mass due to the nature of photons interacting within the universe. The conversation also touches on the challenges of defining total mass in an infinite and dynamic universe, suggesting that a more relevant measure might be the total energy or momentum of photons rather than their mass. Ultimately, the term "photon" may be misleading, as it could be more accurate to refer to the total radiation field instead.
Louis Nardozi
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
What is the mass of all photons emitted in the universe since the Big Bang?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Louis Nardozi said:
What is the mass of all photons emitted in the universe since the Big Bang?
Zero

See our FAQ: Do Photons have Mass?
 
  • Like
Likes Dale
DrGreg said:
Zero

That's the mass of each individual photon, but I think the OP reather asks for the total mass of all photons.
 
Isn't n times Zero still zero?
 
sophiecentaur said:
Isn't n times Zero still zero?
It is.
 
Let's try this phys.org precis of a paper that estimated all of the starlight in the visible universe since "time zero":
https://phys.org/news/2018-11-scientists-starlight-universe.html
... according to the new measurement, the number of photons (particles of visible light) that escaped into space after being emitted by stars translates to 4x1084

I think the OP wanted a big number. This tidbit fulfills that I believe.
 
DrStupid said:
That's the mass of each individual photon, but I think the OP reather asks for the total mass of all photons.
sophiecentaur said:
Isn't n times Zero still zero?
This actually raises all sorts of complications. The answer I gave in post #2 is really the answer to the question "What is the sum of all the the masses of photons emitted since the Big Bang?" But in relativity, the mass of a collection of particles is not necessarily equal to the sum of the masses of each particle. In special relativity, a collection of photons has a non-zero mass, unless all the photons travel in the same direction. In general relativity, the mass of a system isn't a well-defined concept. There are a number of different types of system mass, and some of them make sense only in special circumstances.

The original question asked about all photons emitted throughout the duration of the Universe, and they cannot be considered as a system of particles with a system mass, as photons are being created and destroyed all the time. Even if the question was changed to refer to all photons in existence now (whatever "now" is interpreted to mean), it still doesn't make much sense, I think, to talk about system mass as the photons don't form an isolated system: they are interacting with other particles.

So I think the best answer is ##4 \times 10^{84} \times 0 = 0##.
 
  • Like
Likes sophiecentaur
DrStupid said:
That's the mass of each individual photon, but I think the OP reather asks for the total mass of all photons.
So zero times infinity?Also, isn't the "number of anything in the universe" entirely non-sensical? If the universe is both homogenous and infinite (both of which we assume) then the total number of photons is infinity, and has been since the electroweak epoch. Before which the number was exactly zero.
 
newjerseyrunner said:
So zero times infinity?

No, it isn't (not only in this special case). Better get the total energy E and the total momentum p of all potons and calculate the total mass according to E²=m²+p² (with c=1).

newjerseyrunner said:
If the universe is both homogenous and infinite (both of which we assume) then the total number of photons is infinity, and has been since the electroweak epoch.

That's the trivial case. Reading "universe" as the visible universe is more challenging.
 
  • #10
newjerseyrunner said:
So zero times infinity?
##10^{84}## is a fairly large number, but it's still a finite number.
 
  • #11
I was looking for something along the lines of:

4*1084*Percentage of photons still traveling in space (gotta be close to unity)* mass of photon traveling in space.
I wanted to see how it matched up to the amount of "dark matter" or "dark energy" in the universe.
 
  • #12
OTOH, a sharp upper limit on a photon's mass, 1.77 x 10-54 kg, times 4 x 1084, gives 7.107 x 1030 kg. A few solar masses, eh?:smile:
 
Last edited:
  • #13
Louis Nardozi said:
I wanted to see how it matched up to the amount of "dark matter" or "dark energy" in the universe.

Then you don't need or want the additional complication of integrating over the entire universe. The photon density is enough to compare. It's something like 10-5 of the total density.
 
  • #14
Louis Nardozi said:
4*1084*Percentage of photons still traveling in space (gotta be close to unity)* mass of photon traveling in space. I wanted to see how it matched up to the amount of "dark matter" or "dark energy" in the universe.

It seems the term "photon" caused a lot of confusion. I think what you actually mean is the total radiation field.
 
Back
Top