What is the maximum possible specific impulse.

AI Thread Summary
A hypothetical antimatter rocket could achieve a specific impulse (ISP) of around 1,000,000 seconds, but this is not perfectly efficient due to energy losses from mesons and gamma rays. The discussion raises questions about maximizing ISP by reducing these energy losses and whether there are theories to harness this lost energy. Currently, there are few practical theories or plans for antimatter rockets, primarily due to the extremely limited production of antimatter. The complexities of calculating potential ISP improvements remain largely unexplored. Overall, the feasibility of enhancing ISP beyond the theoretical maximum is uncertain and requires further investigation.
Ryan_m_b
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Messages
5,963
Reaction score
726
Hi there,

I'm aware that a hypothetical antimatter rocket could have a specific impulse of ~1,000,000 seconds. At first I thought that this would be the highest isp possible as antimatter/matter collision releases all the energy in the mass. However as wikipedia put's it

"It is not perfectly efficient; energy is lost as the rest mass of the charged and uncharged mesons, lost as the kinetic energy of the uncharged mesons (which can't be deflected for thrust), and lost as gamma rays."

So whilst it may be impractical to the point of impossibility what is the maximum isp that could be obtained if less energy was lost (and are their any theories on how to utilize this lost energy) Are there any theoretical ways of boosting that 1megasecond number?

Many thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There are currently very few theories or plans to utilize an antimatter rocket, as the production of antimatter is extremely small. You can try to crunch the numbers if you'd like, but otherwise I don't think anyone really knows unless they did the same.
 
Drakkith said:
There are currently very few theories or plans to utilize an antimatter rocket, as the production of antimatter is extremely small. You can try to crunch the numbers if you'd like, but otherwise I don't think anyone really knows unless they did the same.

I wouldn't even know where to begin I'm afraid. Thanks anyway though:smile:
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top