Specific Impulse - I just don't get it.

  • Thread starter Thread starter StrayCatalyst
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Impulse Specific
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of specific impulse (Isp) in rocket propulsion, particularly focusing on Fission-fragment rocket engines and Dusty plasma engines, both estimated to achieve an Isp of 1,000,000 seconds. The practical challenges of using wire in reaction chambers at high speeds and temperatures are highlighted, with potential solutions involving carbon nanotubes (CNT). The viability of these technologies is contingent on the cost of 242 Americium remaining below $1500 per gram. The relationship between thrust, specific impulse, and mass flow rate is also emphasized, indicating that higher Isp results in lower mass flow rates for a given thrust.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of specific impulse (Isp) in rocket propulsion
  • Familiarity with Fission-fragment rocket engine technology
  • Knowledge of Dusty plasma engine mechanics
  • Basic principles of thrust and mass flow rate in aerospace engineering
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mechanics of Fission-fragment rocket engines
  • Explore the properties and applications of carbon nanotubes (CNT) in aerospace
  • Study the principles of Dusty plasma engines and their advantages
  • Learn about thrust calculations and the relationship between Isp and mass flow rate
USEFUL FOR

Aerospace engineers, science fiction writers, and anyone interested in advanced rocket propulsion technologies and their practical applications.

StrayCatalyst
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
I'm working on a hard sci fi story, so I'm trying to get the technical details right - but I don't actually have a background in space travel, astrophysics, orbital mechanics, etc, so I'm running up against my own ignorance. I've Googled it, read the wiki, read NASA's site, and I'm still clueless.

A Fission-fragment rocket engine has a specific impulse (estimated) of 1,000,000 seconds. There are some significant practical problems (like feeding wire through the reaction chamber at 1km/s to allow it to react without simply vaporizing from the heat). The wire in question might be replaced with CNT or similar, which might allow the wire to remain within the reaction chamber for longer without melting - the papers I've read predated CNTs by a few years.

Dusty plasma engines appear to have the same impulse, without the problem of having to keep a wire cooler than melting temp while inside the reaction chamber.

Both of these depend on the price of 242Americium being cheaper than $1500 a gram in order to be viable, but that's not my question.

So, given a specific impulse of 1,000,000 seconds on a ship of 50 tons weight, what sort of thrust could this engine produce, for how much fuel consumed?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
StrayCatalyst said:
I'm working on a hard sci fi story, so I'm trying to get the technical details right - but I don't actually have a background in space travel, astrophysics, orbital mechanics, etc, so I'm running up against my own ignorance. I've Googled it, read the wiki, read NASA's site, and I'm still clueless.

A Fission-fragment rocket engine has a specific impulse (estimated) of 1,000,000 seconds. There are some significant practical problems (like feeding wire through the reaction chamber at 1km/s to allow it to react without simply vaporizing from the heat). The wire in question might be replaced with CNT or similar, which might allow the wire to remain within the reaction chamber for longer without melting - the papers I've read predated CNTs by a few years.

Dusty plasma engines appear to have the same impulse, without the problem of having to keep a wire cooler than melting temp while inside the reaction chamber.

Both of these depend on the price of 242Americium being cheaper than $1500 a gram in order to be viable, but that's not my question.

So, given a specific impulse of 1,000,000 seconds on a ship of 50 tons weight, what sort of thrust could this engine produce, for how much fuel consumed?
Thrust is proportional to specific impluse (Isp) and mass flow rate (\dot{m}). There is a conversion factor involved in the product to get the actual thrust.

http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/k-12/airplane/specimp.html

The higher the Isp, the lower the mass flowrate for a given thrust. But Isp requires energy/power.

BTW - this is an aerospace engineering matter and not so much astrophysics.
 
Thank you for moving this to the correct part of the forum, I'll take a look at the link and see if that clears things up.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
16K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
10K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
22
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
10K