What is the meaning of := in mathematical notation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter BustedBreaks
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mean Notation
AI Thread Summary
The notation "u := -v" indicates that u is defined to be the negative of v, where v has been previously established. This use of ":=" is common in mathematical contexts to clarify definitions. It is often encountered in advanced topics, such as Fourier Transforms, where precise variable definitions are crucial. Additionally, software like MathCad utilizes this notation for defining variables and functions. Overall, ":=" serves as a clear way to communicate the relationship between variables in mathematical expressions.
BustedBreaks
Messages
62
Reaction score
0
u := -v

specifically the " := "

Here is the context. When f, g are suitably regular functions on R we can use the change of variable u:=-v etc..I should add that I came across this in a Fourier Transform book..

Thanks!
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
It usually means 'defined to be'.

So in this context, we know what v is, and we want to define u as a new variable. So you write u := -v to let the reader know u is being defined as -v (where v has been defined previously).
 
Ah... well that makes sense
thank you very much.
 
What, you haven't learned all half-dozen (dozen?) different symbols for "defined as" yet? :p
 
the program MathCad uses the ":=" to define things like variables and functions. perhaps you saw a document made with mathcad?
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top