What is the meaning of manifest locality in Lagrangian formalism?

  • Thread starter Thread starter atyy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Locality
atyy
Science Advisor
Messages
15,170
Reaction score
3,379
The term "manifest locality" keeps being used, eg. in talks by Cachazo http://pirsa.org/10080013/ and Arkani-Hamed http://online.kitp.ucsb.edu/online/bblunch/arkanihamed/ .

In Hamiltonian QFT, "locality" means Lorentz invariance, and is implemented by requiring that spacelike field operators commute.

Is "manifest locality" in the Lagrangian formalism the same thing? If so, I guess it means that (i) the Lagrangian consists of sums and products of fields at the same place and time, and (ii) the action is Lorentz covariant? (Seems maybe not, since they always talk about "manifest locality" of the Feynman diagrams - what does that mean?)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm pretty sure that it just means your point (i).
Manifest locality means that your lagrangian can be written as the integral of a lagrangian density, which is a sum of products of fields at the same space-time point. You also need to have only a finite number of derivatives.

You can have locality without Lorentz covariance, so I'm not sure about your Hamiltonian QFT statement.
 
Thread 'LQG Legend Writes Paper Claiming GR Explains Dark Matter Phenomena'
A new group of investigators are attempting something similar to Deur's work, which seeks to explain dark matter phenomena with general relativity corrections to Newtonian gravity is systems like galaxies. Deur's most similar publication to this one along these lines was: One thing that makes this new paper notable is that the corresponding author is Giorgio Immirzi, the person after whom the somewhat mysterious Immirzi parameter of Loop Quantum Gravity is named. I will be reviewing the...
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...
Back
Top