What Is the Minimum Angle of Elevation for a Gun to Hit a Target 3000 ft Away?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the minimum angle of elevation required for a gun with a muzzle velocity of 1200 ft/s to hit a target located 3000 ft away. The vector function equation used is r(t) = (v0cosøt)i + (v0sinøt - 16t²)j. The user initially miscalculated the simplification of 3000/100, leading to an incorrect angle. Upon correction, the user confirmed the method was appropriate and acknowledged the error in their calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of projectile motion equations
  • Familiarity with vector functions
  • Basic algebra for solving quadratic equations
  • Knowledge of trigonometric functions related to angles
NEXT STEPS
  • Study projectile motion and its equations in detail
  • Learn how to derive and solve quadratic equations
  • Explore the application of trigonometric functions in physics problems
  • Practice similar problems involving angles of elevation and projectile trajectories
USEFUL FOR

Students in calculus or physics courses, educators teaching projectile motion, and anyone interested in the mathematics of trajectories.

laluser
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I am having a problem with a question from my calc 3 class. I don't think there is any calculus involved, however. So the problem goes like this "A shot is fired from a gun with a muzzle velocity of 1200 ft/s is to hit a target 3000 ft away. Determine the minimum angle of elevation of the gun.
Okay so with the vector function equation r(t) = (v0cosøt)i + (v0sinøt -16t²)j
so i set v0cosøt = 3000 and solve for t and then plug that back in for v0sinøt-16t² and set it equal to 0 and solve for ø? That's what i did and get a different angle than the solutions. Could anyone point a finger in the right direction, please? Thank You.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

laluser said:
… Determine the minimum angle of elevation of the gun.
Okay so with the vector function equation r(t) = (v0cosøt)i + (v0sinøt -16t²)j
so i set v0cosøt = 3000 and solve for t and then plug that back in for v0sinøt-16t² and set it equal to 0 and solve for ø? That's what i did and get a different angle than the solutions. Could anyone point a finger in the right direction, please? Thank You.

Hi laluser! Welcome to PF! :smile:

Well, that looks like the right method …

it should give you a quadratic equation with two solutions …

perhaps you picked the wrong one?

If not, show us what equations you did get. :smile:
 
Thank you for your reply. I just went back to check my answer and I see that when i was simplifying 3000/100 i said it was 300 instead of 30 giving me much bigger angle. Thanks again!
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K