What is the minimum wind speed needed to get 'pop' from a Kitewing?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Phrak
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the minimum wind speed required to achieve lift or "pop" from a Kitewing, a handheld sail used for various terrains. Participants explore the aerodynamic principles involved, including lift coefficients and the effects of wind speed on performance, while acknowledging the experimental nature of aerodynamics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes the Kitewing's specifications, including its size and shape, and expresses curiosity about the minimum wind speed needed for lift.
  • Another participant emphasizes that the question does not have a straightforward answer due to the experimental nature of aerodynamics.
  • A participant provides a rough calculation using the lift equation, estimating parameters like air density and lift coefficient, but expresses uncertainty about the accuracy of their assumptions.
  • Concerns are raised about the reliability of the lift coefficient used in calculations, with one participant suggesting that it may be significantly off due to treating the wing as infinite.
  • Another participant agrees that the initial estimates are not entirely unreasonable but stresses the need for more information to improve accuracy.
  • Questions arise regarding the sources of error in lift calculations, particularly concerning the lift coefficient and its experimental determination.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally acknowledge the complexity of the problem and the experimental nature of aerodynamics. There is no consensus on the accuracy of the calculations or the appropriate lift coefficient, indicating ongoing disagreement and uncertainty.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the limitations of their calculations, including assumptions about the lift coefficient and the need for experimental data to validate their estimates.

Phrak
Messages
4,266
Reaction score
7
There's a product on the market called a Kitewing. It's a hand held sail for ice, water or land. It can be swung horizontally to lift. I'm curious to know how much mimium wind speed would be needed to get some pop?

There are some utube videos out where some get 5 ft of air from level ground. Suprizing for such a small wing.

The sail is symmetric like a wing, having a 5.5 square meters, with an aspect ration of about 2.2, and a roughly eliptical profile. Wing span and washout aren't given.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
So I guess there aren't any AEs around who have any interest in fluid flows without a cabin wraped around them and 500+ horses in the front...
 
Your question doesn't leand itself to a simple answer. Aerodynamics is highly experimental. There isn't a magic formula you can use to arrive at the answer you want.
 
I've run out of time. I'll have to generate some numbers tomorrow afternoon.
 
Cyrus said:
Your question doesn't leand itself to a simple answer. Aerodynamics is highly experimental. There isn't a magic formula you can use to arrive at the answer you want.

I'm looking for a, not too, rough idea of how well it could perform. So far I have,

Mg = ½CLρV²S

ρO = 1.225 kg/m³, density of air at sea level
ρ = 1.1 kg/m³
CL_MAX=1.2
V = 30 mph = 44 fps = 13.4 m/s
S = 5.5 m²
g = 9.8 m/s², acceleration due to gravity.
M = 67 kg
Mg = 146 lb ...very marginal.

For a sail on land, we could assume a "beta" of at least 30 degrees. This means wind speed is 15 mph to obtain a 30 mph relative wind, V at the most favorable tack. The ground speed would be 30*0.866 mph.

For a wing that is mostly single sided except along the leading edge, I'm assuming a max coefficient of lift of only 1.2.

I still don't know if I'm using the right coefficient of lift. CL_MAX is the lift coefficient of an infinite aspect ration section.
 
Sorry, that's way wrong. You want 'not too close' build or use a wind tunnel, or find data generated by someone who has. You've pretty much assumed 99.9% of the problem. Your answer is probably as much as 40% off.
 
You're estimating on the Cl and treating like an infinite wing. Of course it's going to be off, but, IMO, for a first guess, those numbers don't seem all that bad. At least you aren't in the area of an order of magnitude off. Especially since you are treating Cl as a constant (which it isn't) and who knows just what the relative velocity a wing actually sees is. As a total SWAG I think you're not too bad. Just understand that to be accurate you need way more information.
 
FredGarvin said:
You're estimating on the Cl and treating like an infinite wing. Of course it's going to be off, but, IMO, for a first guess, those numbers don't seem all that bad. At least you aren't in the area of an order of magnitude off. Especially since you are treating Cl as a constant (which it isn't) and who knows just what the relative velocity a wing actually sees is. As a total SWAG I think you're not too bad. Just understand that to be accurate you need way more information.

I don't understand the sources of large amounts of error. Is it just CL? But, this is what I was asking. How is CL max obtained from CL max from section data?
 
Last edited:
Phrak said:
I don't understand the sources of large amounts of error. Is it just CL? But, this is what I was asking. How is CL max obtained from CL max from section data?
It's usually not. It is done experimentally...hence Cy's comments.
 
  • #10
FredGarvin said:
It's usually not. It is done experimentally...hence Cy's comments.

I'll read theory of wing sections.