What is the most difficult and advanced level of math that exists?

  • Thread starter Thread starter FishmanGeertz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    advanced
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the complexity of advanced mathematics, highlighting that difficulty varies among individuals. It notes that no single "most difficult" math exists, but mentions significant challenges like the classification of all simple groups and the proof of Fermat's Last Theorem, which are both highly complex and lengthy. The conversation suggests that while few fully grasp these concepts, accessibility to understanding has improved, with resources available for those willing to learn. Ultimately, the perception of difficulty in mathematics is subjective and influenced by personal experience and effort. Advanced mathematics continues to evolve, with new challenges emerging as the field progresses.
FishmanGeertz
Messages
189
Reaction score
0
I have a learning disability solely in math comprehension, much of the advanced math was omitted throughout my high school career. I was able to graduate without any very difficult math.

But I'm curious, what is the most complex, difficult, and advanced level of mathematics that exists?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The level nobody has reached yet.

Honestly your question is pretty meaningless. Different areas of math are difficult to different people.
 
Well, the most difficult math doesn't exist. But there certainly are some mathematical things that are very advanced and very difficult, for example:

- the classification of all simple groups: it's a staggering 10000 pages long and it would take a professional mathematician many years to fully understand the proof.

- the proof of Fermat's last theorem: it would surprise me if there were more than 100 people in this world who understand it
 
micromass said:
- the proof of Fermat's last theorem: it would surprise me if there were more than 100 people in this world who understand it

I don't know about that, here are a couple books that explain it, & with plenty of references to build up the background:
http://books.google.ca/books?id=W1Nso5E6G3YC
http://books.google.ca/books?id=Va-quzVwtMsC
If there are still so few people who understand it, it's only because so few bother to try. I bet a lot of grad students could understand it at this point.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top