What Is the Nature of Orbits in an Inverse-Square Potential?

  • Thread starter Thread starter stunner5000pt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Particle Potential
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 3K views
stunner5000pt
Messages
1,447
Reaction score
5
a particle of mass m moves in a potential V(r) = gamma/r^2 where the constant gamma >0

a) Sketch an effective potential and discuss the nature of the non zero angular momentum (L not zero) orbits without solving for the equation of the trajectory

i know that [tex]V_{eff} = V(r) + \frac{L^2}{2mr^2}[/tex]
here [tex]V_{eff} = \frac{1}{r^2} (\gamma + \frac{L^2}{2m})[/tex]
so it will look like an inverse square graph as in the digram


Calculate the equation of the trajectories discuss their shapes and sketch a typical trajectory

one thing that's got me with this question is that i can't solve for r(t) or even r(phi) because their formulas involve using E which depends on (dr/dt)^2 and i don't end up getting anything solvable. Have a look
for r(t)
[tex]r(t) = \sqrt{\frac{2}{m} (E - V_{eff}(r))}[/tex]
but [tex]E = \frac{1}{2} m \dot{r}^2 + V(r) + \frac{L^2}{2mr^2}[/tex]
and that yeilds nothing useful
am i doing something wrong? Is energy supposed to be zero? But why?

there are two more parts which i will post later on. they are related to a and b.
 

Attachments

  • charge.JPG
    charge.JPG
    5.4 KB · Views: 451
Physics news on Phys.org
stunner,
Your answer to part A looks right. To find the equation of the trajectory, there is a nice trick you can apply. Make the substitution [tex]u=\frac{1}{r}[/tex] and try finding [tex]u(\phi)[/tex]. You will see that the differential equation involving [itex]u[/itex] and [itex]\phi[/itex] can be solved and you will be able to find [tex]u(\phi)[/tex].

In more detail, since [tex]r=\frac{1}{u}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{dr}{dt} = -\frac{1}{u^2} \frac{du}{dt} = -\frac{1}{u^2} \frac{du}{d\theta} \frac{d\theta}{dt}[/tex] where [tex]\frac{d\theta}{dt} = \omega[/tex].

So, substituting for v ([itex]\frac{dr}{dt}[/itex]) in the energy equation you wrote in terms of [itex]\frac{du}{d\theta}[/itex] and [itex]u[/itex], you get

[tex]E = V(u) + \frac{L^2 u^2}{2m} + \frac{1}{2}m(\frac{-L}{m}\frac{du}{d\theta})^2[/tex].

Now differentiate this equation with respect to theta. Can you see that [itex]\frac{du}{d\theta}[/itex] will cancel?

The resulting differential equation you get can then be solved which will give you u (and hence r) as a function of theta. Can you take it from here?
 
Last edited:
Thank You !

alrighty so i had the right idea... the thing is we don't have a textbook for this course and there are so many versioins of the same ofrmula! Anyway here are the ther two questions

If [itex](r_{m},\phi_{m})[/itex] are the planbe polar coordiantes of the perigee, evalute phi m (b) and from this calculate the impace parameter b in terms of the angle of scattering theta. Use this result to compute the differential scattering corss setion in terms of gamma, E and theta

The perigee represents a minimum distance between the mass and thecenter of motion. So to simply differentiate phi(r) w.r.t. r and plug that eqal to szero should yield the answer b.
if you could have a look at this thread too that would be awesome too
based on a similar concept
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=106913
 
Last edited:
siddharth said:
stunner,
Your answer to part A looks right. To find the equation of the trajectory, there is a nice trick you can apply. Make the substitution [tex]u=\frac{1}{r}[/tex] and try finding [tex]u(\phi)[/tex]. You will see that the differential equation involving [itex]u[/itex] and [itex]\phi[/itex] can be solved and you will be able to find [tex]u(\phi)[/tex].

In more detail, since [tex]r=\frac{1}{u}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{dr}{dt} = -\frac{1}{u^2} \frac{du}{dt} = -\frac{1}{u^2} \frac{du}{d\theta} \frac{d\theta}{dt}[/tex] where [tex]\frac{d\theta}{dt} = \omega[/tex].

So, substituting for v ([itex]\frac{dr}{dt}[/itex]) in the energy equation you wrote in terms of [itex]\frac{du}{d\theta}[/itex] and [itex]u[/itex], you get

[tex]E = V(u) + \frac{L^2 u^2}{2m} + \frac{1}{2}m(\frac{-L}{m}\frac{du}{d\theta})^2[/tex].

Now differentiate this equation with respect to theta. Can you see that [itex]\frac{du}{d\theta}[/itex] will cancel?

The resulting differential equation you get can then be solved which will give you u (and hence r) as a function of theta. Can you take it from here?


first of all I am not quite sure if i am supposd to be using that version of E in this problem
what does [itex]\frac{dE}{d \theta}[/itex] yield that is useful?

also i get a differential equation with (u'')^2 which cnat be solved
 
stunner5000pt said:
first of all I am not quite sure if i am supposd to be using that version of E in this problem
what does [itex]\frac{dE}{d \theta}[/itex] yield that is useful?
also i get a differential equation with (u'')^2 which cnat be solved

In my post, [tex]\theta[/tex] was the polar angle. So [tex]\frac{dE}{d \theta}[/tex] is 0 because total energy is conserved. I'm pretty sure you don't get a (u'')^2 term. You could post and show where you are stuck.
 
Last edited: