What is the new distance between the rope and the Earth?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Punkyc7
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Earth Rope
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the mathematical problem of determining the distance between a rope wrapped around the Earth and the Earth's surface after the rope is cut and extended by 3 feet. The original radius of the Earth is given as 250,000 units. The key formula used is the circumference equation, C = 2πR, leading to the conclusion that the height between the rope and the Earth after the extension is x = 3/(2π). This demonstrates that the increase in circumference directly correlates to a proportional increase in radius.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic geometry and circumference calculations
  • Familiarity with algebraic manipulation of equations
  • Knowledge of the mathematical constant π (pi)
  • Ability to interpret and apply physical concepts in mathematical contexts
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the implications of circumference and radius in circular geometry
  • Learn about the properties of π and its applications in real-world scenarios
  • Investigate how changes in length affect physical systems, such as tension in ropes
  • Study the mathematical modeling of physical objects and their interactions with forces
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physics students, educators, and anyone interested in the application of geometry to real-world problems involving circular objects.

Punkyc7
Messages
415
Reaction score
0
a rope is wrapped tightly around the Earth (radius 250000). The rope is cut and 3 feet are added to it and the ends are reconnected. Again it is wrapped around the earth. How much space is now between the rope and the earth



so C_{0} =2piR

and C=2pi(R+x)

so to find the height is ti 2piR+2pix-2piR=3

so

x=3/2pi
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Punkyc7 said:
a rope is wrapped tightly around the Earth (radius 250000).

250,000 whats?. Furlongs? Units are crucial -- always include them.

Punkyc7 said:
The rope is cut and 3 feet are added to it and the ends are reconnected. Again it is wrapped around the earth. How much space is now between the rope and the earth

I take issue with the phrasing of the question. If the rope is again wrapped around the Earth (i.e. around its surface), then my automatic answer/assumption would be that there is still no space between the rope and the Earth, only now the rope goes around the Earth for slightly more than one full turn.

However, if the question is actually supposed to be, "what is the radius of a circle formed by the new rope, and how much larger is this radius than the radius of the Earth?", then what you have done below looks fine.

Punkyc7 said:
so C_{0} =2piR

and C=2pi(R+x)

so to find the height is ti 2piR+2pix-2piR=3

so

x=3/2pi

No surprise here. Circumference varies linearly with radius, meaning that it is proportional to it, with the constant of proportionality being 2\pi.
 
Punkyc7 said:
a rope is wrapped tightly around the Earth (radius 250000). The rope is cut and 3 feet are added to it and the ends are reconnected. Again it is wrapped around the earth. How much space is now between the rope and the earth

so C_{0} =2piR

and C=2pi(R+x)

so to find the height is ti 2piR+2pix-2piR=3

so

x=3/2pi

Your first job is to compute the circumference given a radius of 250000.

Your second is to compute a new radius given that circumference plus 3.

I'll leave the third step to you.
 
AC130Nav said:
Your first job is to compute the circumference given a radius of 250000.

Your second is to compute a new radius given that circumference plus 3.

I'll leave the third step to you.

Umm...no? He did the algebra and he got the answer. EDIT: he or she

EDIT2: What I'm saying here is that leaving things symbolic is fine. Plugging in numbers for R doesn't gain you anything when you can do algebraic manipulations to solve for the exact quantity you're looking for, and that is what the OP has already done.
 
Could be a trick question.

Due to the potential mass of the rope, if there was ANYWAY that you could add more to it (without it slipping into the ocean), then that length would only allow more lee-way for it to move lower elsewhere.

And when I say elsewhere, I mean, somewhere really close. It would either lower into the nearest soft body or do nothing and fall over aloof.

Anyway, this isn't helping :P.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K