What is the newest installment of 'Random Thoughts' on Physics Forums?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Evo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Random Thoughts
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around frustrations with current documentary programming, particularly criticizing the History Channel's focus on sensational topics like time travel conspiracies instead of real historical content. Participants express disappointment over National Geographic's sale to Fox, fearing a decline in quality programming. The conversation shifts to lighter topics, including humorous anecdotes about everyday life, such as a malfunctioning kitchen fan discovered to be blocked by installation instructions. There are also discussions about the challenges of understanding various dialects in Belgium, the complexities of language, and personal experiences with weather and housing in California. Members share their thoughts on food, including a peculiar dish of zucchini pancakes served with strawberry yogurt, and delve into mathematical concepts related to sandwich cutting and the properties of numbers. The thread captures a blend of serious commentary and lighthearted banter, reflecting a diverse range of interests and perspectives among participants.
  • #3,901
If she is a boy and he is a girl, what do you think are my grades in English class?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #3,902
fresh_42 said:
I assume they thought this would save marketing costs. Unfortunately for them, they made the calculation without people's subconsciousness. Typical case of: not thought to the end.

I once lived in an apartment building with neighbors named Buse (her name, Busen= bosom) and Bock (his name, = buck).
But they are comedians , so it may be in their favor.
 
  • #3,903
There is this ( I assume) half insane woman in coffee shop that gives people the finger while pretending to scratch her face. Talk about advantages of being a woman. she has been doing this for months now. If she was a man, she (_he) would have been challenged for a fight long ago.
 
  • #3,904
I started doing push-ups regularly and after a while, one day, I felt like a small sense of confidence that I could do one arm push-ups. It was as if without trying, I could clearly gauge my own capacity at that point. Got myself on the ground and to my surprise, I could do them!

It felt really good. I was like: "Oof. I'm strong." :-p

But once I was able to do it, I realized that it didn't require that much strength to do one arm push-ups. It wasn't something that required hard training to achieve. Although I'm not sure if the weight of the person influences the amount of training needed by that person. I have always been light. Whenever I'm moving something heavy, I always get told that the object can lift me, rather than the other way around :oldlaugh:.

So the random thought that crossed my mind is that when one exercises regularly, one sort of gets a feeling of one's own capacity to perform a certain task. Whether you can do it easily or whether it will cost you. I don't know how to explain it. You just can assess the situation and your capacities better than when you don't exercise at all.
 
  • #3,905
Psinter said:
I started doing push-ups regularly and after a while, one day, I felt like a small sense of confidence that I could do one arm push-ups. It was as if without trying, I could clearly gauge my own capacity at that point. Got myself on the ground and to my surprise, I could do them!

It felt really good. I was like: "Oof. I'm strong." :-p

But once I was able to do it, I realized that it didn't require that much strength to do one arm push-ups. It wasn't something that required hard training to achieve. Although I'm not sure if the weight of the person influences the amount of training needed by that person. I have always been light. Whenever I'm moving something heavy, I always get told that the object can lift me, rather than the other way around :oldlaugh:.

So the random thought that crossed my mind is that when one exercises regularly, one sort of gets a feeling of one's own capacity to perform a certain task. Whether you can do it easily or whether it will cost you. I don't know how to explain it. You just can assess the situation and your capacities better than when you don't exercise at all.
How about one-finger push-ups? Any time soon? ( Don't try it , may fracture the finger)
 
  • #3,906
WWGD said:
How about one-finger push-ups? Any time soon? ( Don't try it , may fracture the finger)
Not at all. I can push-up my finger without any noteworthy efforts as often as I like.
 
  • Like
Likes Psinter
  • #3,907
Woman in coffee shop giving the finger more openly today, no pretense of scratching her face. Kind of funny but sad to see deranged people outside of special housing.
 
  • #3,908
WWGD said:
Woman in coffee shop giving the finger more openly today, no pretense of scratching her face. Kind of funny but sad to see deranged people outside of special housing.
Well, at least a sign of honesty :biggrin:
 
  • #3,909
WWGD said:
How about one-finger push-ups? Any time soon? ( Don't try it , may fracture the finger)
:oldlaugh:

Perhaps one day. :DD
______________________________________

Trying to use wax to remove some parts of my eyebrows for a longer lasting look and it ripped my skin off. Now I have a red-brown patch where the bright red thin layer of blood was. And it didn't remove the hairs! Just the skin! I look awesome now. Thank you :rolleyes:.

Looking for a solution I feel overwhelmed by the amount of makeup products in the cosmetics section. How do people even know what to use? Time to visit YouTube for makeup tutorials.
 
  • #3,910
Why not glue the hairs and skin together in the brow area?Or just draw in some brows with a crayon, uncle Leo style (Seinfeld)?
 
  • #3,911
It goes beyond deciding if app is short for application or appetizer.
 
  • #3,912
Windows' error messages have changed from :
Windows has run into an error...
to:
Your PC has run into an error...
 
  • #3,913
WWGD said:
Woman in coffee shop giving the finger more openly today, no pretense of scratching her face. Kind of funny but sad to see deranged people outside of special housing.
Why don't you date her? :oldlaugh:

Crazy ones make for good dates :DD.

JFOwC36.jpg


Just kidding. Don't go there.

But following that line of thoughts, I think I once heard someone say to not think that you can change someone. Looks like some people who date, think they can change parts of their partners that they don't like. That they can convince them to be different. And it somehow doesn't go as expected.
 

Attachments

  • JFOwC36.jpg
    JFOwC36.jpg
    14.7 KB · Views: 611
Last edited:
  • #3,914
Psinter said:
Why don't you date her? :oldlaugh:

Crazy ones make for good dates :DD.

View attachment 227562

Just kidding. Don't go there.

But following that line of thoughts, I think I once heard someone say to not think that you can change someone. Looks like some people who date, think they can change parts of their partners that they don't like. That they can convince them to be different.
You mean like their eyebrows? :).
 
  • Like
Likes Psinter
  • #3,915
Psinter said:
Why don't you date her? :oldlaugh:

Crazy ones make for good dates :DD.

View attachment 227562

Just kidding. Don't go there.

But following that line of thoughts, I think I once heard someone say to not think that you can change someone. Looks like some people who date, think they can change parts of their partners that they don't like. That they can convince them to be different. And it somehow doesn't go as expected.
But, you have a point dating wise. I have a magnetic personality:every deranged person around seems to find me and approach me.
 
  • Like
Likes Psinter
  • #3,916
I finally understood why a matrix is a (1,1) -tensor. After like a year.
 
  • #3,917
WWGD said:
But, you have a point dating wise. I have a magnetic personality:every deranged person around seems to find me and approach me.
I know this characteristic too well. Always thought it's only me ...
 
  • #3,918
WWGD said:
I finally understood why a matrix is a (1,1) -tensor. After like a year.
And now for the next lesson: it's also a (2,0) or a (0,2) tensor. :biggrin:
 
  • Like
Likes Ibix
  • #3,919
WWGD said:
But, you have a point dating wise. I have a magnetic personality:every deranged person around seems to find me and approach me.
Back in undergrad days I was chatting to a friend in the corridor when a girl we both knew came round the corner, took one look at my friend, said "oh!" and went haring off back round the corner. I gave him a "that was weird" kind of look and he shrugs and says "It's my animal magnetism - I just need to figure out how to flip the polarity..."

(She showed up again two minutes later with a book he'd lent her.)
 
  • #3,920
fresh_42 said:
And now for the next lesson: it's also a (2,0) or a (0,2) tensor. :biggrin:
...and only if it's got the right transformation laws.
 
  • #3,921
Ibix said:
...and only if it's got the right transformation laws.
I found the answer through meditation : Hom, Hom,...
 
  • Like
Likes fresh_42
  • #3,922
Ibix said:
...and only if it's got the right transformation laws.
Only for physicists. For me it's only important how many asterisks are involved! That's sufficient for me to know what to do. And don't bring up co- and contravariances. My book about homological algebra uses them differently anyway.
 
  • #3,923
fresh_42 said:
Only for physicists. For me it's only important how many asterisks are involved! That's sufficient for me to know what to do. And don't bring up co- and contravariances. My book about homological algebra uses them differently anyway.
OK, but still you have a condition over and above being a square matrix. The Christoffel connection coefficients are representible by an NxNxN matrix, but aren't a tensor.
 
  • #3,924
Every "rectangle" collection of numbers in any dimension can be interpreted as a tensor, a cube is just ##\sum x \otimes y \otimes z##.
 
  • #3,925
Can be interpreted as, sure. But can be interpreted otherwise too (e.g. the connection). So I object to the "is" part of "a matrix is a tensor".
 
  • #3,926
Ibix said:
OK, but still you have a condition over and above being a square matrix. The Christoffel connection coefficients are representible by an NxNxN matrix, but aren't a tensor.
But isn't a matrix just a 2D array? Or maybe it is the confusion of notational/definitional differencees?
 
  • #3,927
It's the old discussion what a transformation and what its matrix is. A tensor to me is simply an element of a tensor algebra, resp. space, if only tensors of equal rank are involved. As soon as I have a basis of the constituent vector spaces, I have a cube or whatever a matrix (not necessarily square) in higher dimensions shall be called. Their use by physicists makes me dizzy. It always sounds curved somehow, but it's flat as a board.
 
Last edited:
  • #3,928
fresh_42 said:
Every "rectangle" collection of numbers in any dimension can be interpreted as a tensor, a cube is just #\sum x \otimes y \otimes z##.
What type of or theory of Homology are you using?
 
  • #3,929
WWGD said:
What type of or theory of Homology are you using?
Covariance and contravariance determines, whether a functor keeps the direction of mapping arrows or converts them. I have never seen a second category by the way physicists use these terms - there are always only vector spaces present. If at all, it's the transition ##V \rightarrow V^*##, but they attach it to either ##V## or ##V^*##, so again no second category.
 
  • #3,930
fresh_42 said:
It's the old discussion what a transformation and what its matrix is. A tensor to me is simply an element of a tensor algebra, resp. space, if only tensors of equal rank are involved. As soon as I have a basis of the constituent vector spaces, I have a cube or whatever a matrix (not necessarily square) in higher dimensions shall be called. Their use by physicists makes me dizzy. It always sounds curved somehow, but it's flat as a board.
This looks more like geometric algebra. Or Simplicial.
 
  • #3,931
WWGD said:
This looks more like geometric algebra. Or Simplicial.
No, it looks like homological algebra, the category thingies, at least the books are titled so, both, the English and the German ones.
 
  • #3,932
Ibix said:
Can be interpreted as, sure. But can be interpreted otherwise too (e.g. the connection). So I object to the "is" part of "a matrix is a tensor".
So it depends on what "is" is?
 
  • #3,933
Yo mama so fat , when she walks around the house... she _really_ walks around the house.
 
  • #3,934

Attachments

  • oLG93mr.gif
    oLG93mr.gif
    595.2 KB · Views: 330
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Borg
  • #3,935
Can someone please find a word for "Erkenntnis". The only possibility I see is "knowledge", but there is a fundamental difference between knowing something and understood something! Too bad we don't have philosophy here. I would be very interested which consequences it has to a society, that only knows things and doesn't care about "Erkenntnis".

And, no, re-cognition doesn't count. It's only to realize what's already known. I'm looking for the knowledge behind "Eureka!".
 
  • #3,936
fresh_42 said:
Can someone please find a word for "Erkenntnis". The only possibility I see is "knowledge", but there is a fundamental difference between knowing something and understood something! Too bad we don't have philosophy here. I would be very interested which consequences it has to a society, that only knows things and doesn't care about "Erkenntnis".

And, no, re-cognition doesn't count. It's only to realize what's already known. I'm looking for the knowledge behind "Eureka!".
Insight?
 
  • Like
Likes fresh_42
  • #3,937
Jonathan Scott said:
Insight?
Oh, I haven't thought about this one. Probably because it means something different in German. Insight here reflects on a revised and corrected position, or the possibility to view formerly closed documents.
 
  • #3,938
Have you even laughed so hard that you could literally feel your ab muscles ripping?
 
  • #3,939
Are rainbows chromatic aberrations, or vice versa?
 
  • Like
Likes collinsmark
  • #3,940
I've incidentally found a place in town today where people can actually play boules - people who played it inclusively.
 
  • #3,941
OmCheeto said:
Are rainbows chromatic aberrations, or vice versa?
They're more or less a product of chromatic aberration, yes. I'm not sure you can really call it chromatic aberration when it's not part of an optical system designed to form an achromatic image, but it's the same root cause, certainly.
 
  • Like
Likes OmCheeto
  • #3,942
fresh_42 said:
I've incidentally found a place in town today where people can actually play boules - people who played it inclusively.
I play boules
(I need no tools)
Against fools
While eating moules.
 
  • #3,943
Ibix said:
I play boules
(I need no tools)
Against fools
While eating moules.
Correction: Pétanque.

Your turn.
 
  • #3,944
fresh_42 said:
Correction: Pétanque.

Your turn.
I'll be frank
I play petanque
But I don't clank
'less I bring my tank.
 
  • Like
Likes fresh_42
  • #3,945
Ibix said:
I'll be frank
I play petanque
But I don't clank
'less I bring my tank.
You know this doesn't work with the actual pronunciation?
Our town is considered the most multi-cultural in Germany, but I didn't know that French belong to this mixture.
 
  • Like
Likes Ibix
  • #3,946
fresh_42 said:
You know this doesn't work with the actual pronunciation?
Our town is considered the most multi-cultural in Germany, but I didn't know that French belong to this mixture.
It works with the usual anglicised pronunciation. And just Googling it (from an English computer in England, anyway) gives me the same pronunciation. How's it supposed to be pronounced?
 
  • #3,947
Ibix said:
How's it supposed to be pronounced?
[peˈtaŋkɔ]
There is no correspondence to the French nasal syllables in English. Frank was o.k., since the French pronounce it similar, but then I don't think there is a way to make it rhyme in English. That's why I corrected boules. :wink:
 
  • Like
Likes Ibix
  • #3,948
Hmm. Google is offering pəˈtaŋk - which I think is the same except it's missing the final symbol - and the "listen to the pronunciation" comes out so that it rhymes with frank/clank/tank. But I do vaguely recall how to pronounce frank (or, at least, franc). And there won't be much that rhymes with that in English. As you say, we don't have that sort of sound.

Anyway, my doggerel works in English. And I'm speaking English. Not my fault if foreigners can't pronounce their own language right. :wink:
 
  • Like
Likes fresh_42
  • #3,949
I just looked it up, out of curiosity, and the statistic counts more than 300 French in town, and only a bit over 200 from UK. I would have expected more. At least the 330 are enough to explain a boules match.
 
  • #3,950
Ibix said:
Not my fault if foreigners can't pronounce their own language right.
Are we talking about the Haggis people?
 

Similar threads

35
Replies
2K
Views
51K
Replies
3K
Views
155K
Replies
2K
Views
167K
Replies
4K
Views
230K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Back
Top