What is the newest installment of 'Random Thoughts' on Physics Forums?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Evo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Random Thoughts
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around frustrations with current documentary programming, particularly criticizing the History Channel's focus on sensational topics like time travel conspiracies instead of real historical content. Participants express disappointment over National Geographic's sale to Fox, fearing a decline in quality programming. The conversation shifts to lighter topics, including humorous anecdotes about everyday life, such as a malfunctioning kitchen fan discovered to be blocked by installation instructions. There are also discussions about the challenges of understanding various dialects in Belgium, the complexities of language, and personal experiences with weather and housing in California. Members share their thoughts on food, including a peculiar dish of zucchini pancakes served with strawberry yogurt, and delve into mathematical concepts related to sandwich cutting and the properties of numbers. The thread captures a blend of serious commentary and lighthearted banter, reflecting a diverse range of interests and perspectives among participants.
  • #3,391
I like BS-Bingo. Unfortunately, I assume lunatic is out of competition. To know the branch would have helped.
Here's my proposal for the banking sector:

Leverage
under
non-standard
conditional
home-markets

For more science related topics, one could replace the last one by hypotheses.
 
  • Like
Likes Borg
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #3,392
I'm trying to say lunch without actually saying it. I sent this one to my wife:

Longitudinal
Users
Nonworking
Considerations
Huddle
 
  • Like
Likes BillTre
  • #3,393
Aliments in the workplace
 
  • Like
Likes dlgoff
  • #3,394
Borg said:
I'm trying to say lunch without actually saying it. I sent this one to my wife:

Longitudinal
Users
Nonworking
Considerations
Huddle

I like this, but would modify it to:
Local
Users
Nutritional
Consumption
Huddle
 
  • Like
Likes fresh_42 and Borg
  • #3,395
BillTre said:
I like this, but would modify it to:
Local
Users
Nutritional
Consumption
Huddle
That's what I'm talking about. :oldlaugh:
 
  • #3,396
Google "early 20th century american astronomers" with the quotation marks. Sehr interessant.
 
  • #3,397
What do you mean? I know that my English punctuation isn't the best :sorry:
upload_2018-3-1_20-58-52.png
 

Attachments

  • upload_2018-3-1_20-58-52.png
    upload_2018-3-1_20-58-52.png
    19.6 KB · Views: 351
  • #3,398
fresh_42 said:
What do you mean?
I really was looking for early 20th century American astronomers, not grammar lessons.
 
  • #3,400
This guy asks me directions in the subway. I repeat patiently for almost 10 minutes. Then he just walks out of the station ?
 
  • Like
Likes StoneTemplePython
  • #3,401
fresh_42 said:
good old Wiki?
American. Here I've finally accepted that computers/search engines can do my sorting for me, and I have to do it? It seems like an appropriately constrained inquiry/search, and such an incongruous result. Perhaps it's a function of political correctness.
 
  • #3,402
Bystander said:
American. Here I've finally accepted that computers/search engines can do my sorting for me, and I have to do it? It seems like an appropriately constrained inquiry/search, and such an incongruous result. Perhaps it's a function of political correctness.
Remember that Google customizes searches using your search history.
 
  • #3,404
fresh_42 said:
astronomers+USA+19th
Still forgetting the "plus" syntax; get a whole different set of results. Use it all the time for "imdb."
 
  • #3,405
WWGD said:
And/or to find the name of their favorite artist: actor/singer, etc. Do a search for any name ; when you enter a first name, Google will most likely suggest the last name of an artist. Similar for searches of any sort. EDIT: Re reinforcing prejudices, you have Google contributing to that: it tracks your search history and gives you results that somehow " best fit" your previous searches. It then keeps you in a small neighborhood of your experience set, of your previous searches.

WWGD said:
Remember that Google customizes searches using your search history.
Always make a point of moving past Google's "lazy/customized/assumed" approach.
 
  • #3,406
Bystander said:
Always make a point of moving past Google's "lazy/customized/assumed" approach.
How so? How do you do it? EDIT: Other than using a different search engine?
 
  • #3,407
WWGD said:
How so? How do you do it?
Keep typing until it's no longer offering the auto-completions.
 
  • #3,408
Bystander said:
Keep typing until it's no longer offering the auto-completions.
I always thought of how far down the answer you are looking for as a measure of how close to the mainstream you are: If what you are looking for is in the first listing, you are _the_ mainstream. If you repeatedly need to scroll down, you are pretty far away from the mainstream.
 
  • #3,409
WWGD said:
I always thought of how far down the answer you are looking for as a measure of how close to the mainstream you are: If what you are looking for is in the first listing, you are _the_ mainstream. If you repeatedly need to scroll down, you are pretty far away from the mainstream.
I regularly use Google as a connection test. Therefore I use words which guarantee me answers. Not the words I'm usually searching for.
My reputation at Google is definitely ruined.
 
  • #3,410
There are obviously as many ways "to google" as there are "googlers."
 
  • #3,411
I am remembering a nice sequence that generates all composites: S_n := 1+2+...+n ( Not easy to see without the closed form).

I remember I tried to determine a while back whether ##10^n+1 ; n>2 ## was always composite. Can't remember if I did or whether it is true. EDIT/UPDATE: True thru around n=45. My programming is too primitive to even do this. This means that in lazy, impatient Math, it _is_ true. EDIT2: It seems to be an open problem.
 
Last edited:
  • #3,412
Bystander said:
There are obviously as many ways "to google" as there are "googlers."
I most often " Duck-Duckgo" instead of Googling. But I tend to get poor quality results from Google searches.
 
  • #3,413
darnit. I forgot to be no PF again.

hello
 
  • #3,414
fresh_42 said:
I regularly use Google as a connection test. Therefore I use words which guarantee me answers. Not the words I'm usually searching for.
My reputation at Google is definitely ruined.

BTW a word or phrase for which there is no google result is called a Googlenope

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Googlenope

I just got one with "effervescent peach berries"

One for which there is only one result is called a Goolewhack: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Googlewhack

I don't know even where to start...
 
  • #3,415
Googlenope du jour -
the YAHOO spammers that are harassing me "honanmolviantebeauties.com"

i'm about to set an email filter to automatically forward them all to CEO of Yahoo's parent company Verizon, one Lowell McAdam
 
  • Like
Likes Ibix
  • #3,416
dkotschessaa said:
darnit. I forgot to be no PF again.

hello
Hello! Life getting in the way of important stuff like PF?
 
  • #3,417
Had a surprisingly bad night (woken several times by acid indigestion) a couple of nights ago. Today my wife picked up a magazine off the the coffee table and a ranitidine tablet fell off it, somehow having been hidden in the illustration on the front. It's good to know the explanation for the bad night; medication works better if you actually take it.
 
  • Like
Likes BillTre
  • #3,418
Jonathan Scott said:
medication works better if you actually take it.
No kidding?:olduhh:
 
  • #3,419
Would be nicely isomorphic if Demetrius' younger brother was called Decentimetrius. I offered to name my brother's son Denefiu , given the daughter ( my niece) was called Denise. Denise and Denefiu. I think I would never forget their names.
 
  • #3,420
They claim the word "paying" in "paying attention" is used because the process of attending uses up resources ( so one must pay with resources). But why, then, is the word "pay" or equivalent not used in all languages?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2K ·
63
Replies
2K
Views
56K
  • · Replies 3K ·
89
Replies
3K
Views
159K
  • · Replies 2K ·
76
Replies
2K
Views
170K
  • · Replies 4K ·
134
Replies
4K
Views
235K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3K ·
112
Replies
3K
Views
360K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K