What is the newest installment of 'Random Thoughts' on Physics Forums?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Evo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Random Thoughts
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around frustrations with current documentary programming, particularly criticizing the History Channel's focus on sensational topics like time travel conspiracies instead of real historical content. Participants express disappointment over National Geographic's sale to Fox, fearing a decline in quality programming. The conversation shifts to lighter topics, including humorous anecdotes about everyday life, such as a malfunctioning kitchen fan discovered to be blocked by installation instructions. There are also discussions about the challenges of understanding various dialects in Belgium, the complexities of language, and personal experiences with weather and housing in California. Members share their thoughts on food, including a peculiar dish of zucchini pancakes served with strawberry yogurt, and delve into mathematical concepts related to sandwich cutting and the properties of numbers. The thread captures a blend of serious commentary and lighthearted banter, reflecting a diverse range of interests and perspectives among participants.
  • #3,331
fresh_42 said:
I have a nice one for you. A variation of Descartes which someone scrabbled on the toilet door. However, I think it is not kids proof.
Maybe not, but I would think it would intimidate anyone to see that Germans do graffitti in Latin when most here can barely handle English sentences.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #3,332
WWGD said:
Yes, sorry, I was trying to show-off the two-three phrases I know in Latin
"Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur" is about the only one I can rattle off off the top of my head. Also the Ankh-Morpork City Watch motto, "Fabricati Diem, Pvnc", which means "To Protect and Serve", according to Pratchett.
fresh_42 said:
I have a nice one for you. A variation of Descartes which someone scrabbled on the toilet door. However, I think it is not kids proof.
"I think I am thinking therefore I think I am"?
 
  • #3,333
Ibix said:
"I think I am thinking therefore I think I am"?
That one, yes, but not with to think.
 
  • #3,334
[QUOTE="Ibix, post: 5947123, member: 365269... "Fabricati Diem, Pvnc", which means "To Protect and Serve", according to Pratchett.
"I think I am thinking therefore I think I am"?[/QUOTE]

Thanks for translating that one, I would have thought you were quoting Clint Eastwood: " Do you feel lucky, Pvnc "?
 
  • #3,335
fresh_42 said:
That one, yes, but not with to think.
Still, what is this, a Grad school dropout writing graffiti in Latin? Do they also write graffiti about, e.g., attempted solutions to Navier-Stokes?
 
  • #3,336
WWGD said:
Still, what is this, a Grad school dropout writing graffiti in Latin? Do they also write graffiti about, e.g., attempted solutions to Navier-Stokes?
No. Only a few nasty rhymes about professors.
 
  • #3,337
WWGD said:
Thanks for translating that one, I would have thought you were quoting Clint Eastwood: " Do you feel lucky, Pvnc "?
Make my day, pvnc, I think. In very doggy latin.
WWGD said:
Still, what is this, a Grad school dropout writing graffiti in Latin?
I read that someone wrote "C'est magnifique, mais ce n'est pas la gare" on the walls of Balliol College Oxford once. "It's magnificent, but it's not the station", a rather clever pun on the French Marshal Bosquet's comment on the Charge of the Light Brigade.
 
  • #3,338
fresh_42 said:
No. Only a few nasty rhymes about professors.

Are you one of them ( student rhymers, professor "victim" )?
 
  • #3,339
Ibix said:
Make my day, pvnc, I think. In very doggy latin.
I read that someone wrote "C'est magnifique, mais ce n'est pas la gare" on the walls of Balliol College Oxford once. "It's magnificent, but it's not the station", a rather clever pun on the French Marshal Bosquet's comment on the Charge of the Light Brigade.

It has what the French would call an " I don't know what" , doesn't it ;) ?
 
  • Like
Likes Ibix
  • #3,340
WWGD said:
Are you one of them ( student rhymers, professor "victim" )?
Nope. But I vaguely remember that I had another one in mind, but I didn't leave it there.
 
  • #3,341
fresh_42 said:
Nope. But I vaguely remember that I had another one in mind, but I didn't leave it there.
So, how about giving the exclusive for PF ( In Latin, or some other obscure language -- meaning anything other than English ) ?
 
  • #3,342
WWGD said:
So, how about giving the exclusive for PF ( In Latin, or some other obscure language -- meaning anything other than English ) ?
No names, please. The more as in this special case I've played cards with this professor since on many occasions.
 
  • #3,343
College.

funny-girl-webcomic-clothes-bed.jpg


(Couldn't find the source artist :frown:)
 

Attachments

  • funny-girl-webcomic-clothes-bed.jpg
    funny-girl-webcomic-clothes-bed.jpg
    23.8 KB · Views: 680
  • Like
Likes collinsmark
  • #3,344
Psinter said:
College.

View attachment 220970

(Couldn't find the source artist :frown:)
I think their name should be enough ;). No need to find the artist.
 
  • Like
Likes Psinter
  • #3,345
WWGD said:
I think their name should be enough ;). No need to find the artist.
At least the problem is finite.
 
  • Like
Likes Psinter
  • #3,346
fresh_42 said:
At least the problem is finite.
Finitely defined, or a finite task?
 
  • #3,347
Hey Freshmeiter,
Can you define non-isomorphic Hilbert space structures on the same set/space, say R^n? Just a lead, to not be too "non-random".
 
  • #3,348
WWGD said:
Finitely defined, or a finite task?
Finitely defined. Whether it's of finite execution time is how fast one can check a single case, because it's competing with our astonishing birth rate. Rabbits? What a bad joke!
WWGD said:
Hey Freshmeiter,
Can you define non-isomorphic Hilbert space structures on the same set/space, say R^n? Just a lead, to not be too "non-random".
I don't know, how about function spaces with different measures for square integrability?
 
  • #3,349
Here's a random thought on screen protectors. Are they even worth it? I don't know if I should get a screen protector for my phone. For the last few years all my experiences with screen protectors have been bad. They lose touch sensitivity. I also noticed it takes more than one year for my phones to get screen scratches without protectors. For which I'm wondering if I should maybe give it another chance.

I don't know how some folks manage to scratch their screens. I heavily use my electronics devices and that has never been a problem for me. Maybe they purposely put grains of sand on their fingers and then use their phones. I also don't understand how they let them fall and pretty much crack it the first time. My cellphones and tablet have fallen a lot, but I've never gotten a cracked screen or a cracked edges. Even when a tornado destroyed my place and my phone spent a little more than 2 days submerged in water and at least 50lb of debris, I managed to salvage it. After drying it for 3 days, it turned on fine, it worked, and there was not a single scratch on the screen. It was not waterproof by the way. It was a cheap Galaxy. It had no case protector, nor screen protector. Yet not a single scratch on the screen. Just a few white pixels, but you have to hold it at an angle to even notice the white pixels. Otherwise it is not noticeable. I am being honest when I say that I don't understand how some folks manage to destroy their phones by a single fall. Mine always seem to be quite resistant despite my heavy use and bad treatment towards them.

So I was thinking about the worthiness of screen protectors.
 
  • #3,350
Psinter said:
Here's a random thought on screen protectors. Are they even worth it? I don't know if I should get a screen protector for my phone. For the last few years all my experiences with screen protectors have been bad. They lose touch sensitivity. I also noticed it takes more than one year for my phones to get screen scratches without protectors. For which I'm wondering if I should maybe give it another chance.

I don't know how some folks manage to scratch their screens. I heavily use my electronics devices and that has never been a problem for me. Maybe they purposely put grains of sand on their fingers and then use their phones. I also don't understand how they let them fall and pretty much crack it the first time. My cellphones and tablet have fallen a lot, but I've never gotten a cracked screen or a cracked edges. Even when a tornado destroyed my place and my phone spent a little more than 2 days submerged in water and at least 50lb of debris, I managed to salvage it. After drying it for 3 days, it turned on fine, it worked, and there was not a single scratch on the screen. It was not waterproof by the way. It was a cheap Galaxy. It had no case protector, nor screen protector. Yet not a single scratch on the screen. Just a few white pixels, but you have to hold it at an angle to even notice the white pixels. Otherwise it is not noticeable. I am being honest when I say that I don't understand how some folks manage to destroy their phones by a single fall. Mine always seem to be quite resistant despite my heavy use and bad treatment towards them.

So I was thinking about the worthiness of screen protectors.
Wow, tell that story to one of the phone companies, seems like it would make a great commercial -- and sorry to hear that.
How about the absurdity of putting phones in one's back pocket? A small planned "accident" , a quick hand, and the phone is gone. Or phone drops and it is not so easy to tell. Doesn't seem to make sense.
 
  • Like
Likes StoneTemplePython
  • #3,351
Neither Ernest nor Julio's children inherited their fathers Gallo's humor.
 
  • Like
Likes Ibix
  • #3,352
WWGD said:
How about the absurdity of putting phones in one's back pocket? A small planned "accident" , a quick hand, and the phone is gone. Or phone drops and it is not so easy to tell. Doesn't seem to make sense.
Indeed. I wouldn't put my phone on my back pockets. It really makes no sense unless one has no front side pockets.
 
  • #3,353
Here's another random thought:

People are not as good-looking as in their online shared pictures, nor as ugly as in their driver's license photo.

:oldlaugh:
 
  • Like
Likes WWGD, Ibix, StoneTemplePython and 1 other person
  • #3,354
Psinter said:
Indeed. I wouldn't put my phone on my back pockets. It really makes no sense unless one has no front side pockets.
I don't mean to get too heavy on this, but to me this agrees with the claim that cognition is largely social, i.e., people do things and express beliefs largely based on what they see around them; what the views are of their friends/circle , and not so often based on their independent evaluation of facts.
 
  • #3,355
I've got one phone in my (back?) pocket, and the other one's hailing a taxi cab giving a high five.
 
  • #3,356
Wow, I just saw a woman who was around 7' tall. This one not wearing heels, unlike most of the other 6'+ women I have seen -- they can put the phones in their back -pocket, it will be too high up for most.
 
  • #3,357
StoneTemplePython said:
I've got one phone in my (back?) pocket, and the other one's hailing a taxi cab giving a high five.
Not sure I get it. Are you referring to pocket dialing?
 
  • #3,358
WWGD said:
Not sure I get it. Are you referring to pocket dialing?

Was trying to weave in lyrics from the song -- "Hand in my pocket".

- - - -
It sounded more clever before I finished my coffee
 
  • Like
Likes WWGD
  • #3,359
My Gf needs a strong double expresso to start her day/
I'm Ok with just regular coffee.
 
  • #3,360
If there was a spammer on the forum, it's hard to say how most people would react but I like to think that I would charge after him and click the Report button.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2K ·
63
Replies
2K
Views
57K
  • · Replies 3K ·
89
Replies
3K
Views
159K
  • · Replies 2K ·
76
Replies
2K
Views
170K
  • · Replies 4K ·
134
Replies
4K
Views
235K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3K ·
112
Replies
3K
Views
360K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K