What is the Optimal Angle for Minimizing Work in Kinetic Friction?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the optimal angle for a rope being used to pull a case along horizontal ground, specifically focusing on minimizing the work done per unit distance in the presence of kinetic friction. The relationship between the angle and the coefficient of kinetic friction is central to the problem.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship ## tan \theta = \mu_k ## and its implications for minimizing work. Questions arise regarding the correctness of derivative calculations and the conditions for minima versus maxima. Some participants express confusion about the differentiation process and the setup of the problem.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights and questioning each other's reasoning. There is no explicit consensus yet, but several lines of inquiry are being explored, particularly around the differentiation of work with respect to the angle and the conditions for achieving a minimum.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem involves assumptions about the forces acting on the case and the role of kinetic friction. There is also a mention of previous discussions on similar questions, indicating a broader context of inquiry within the forum.

patrickmoloney
Messages
94
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement



Using the relation ## tan \theta = \mu_k ## what angle should the rope make with the horizontal
in order to minimize the work done per unit distance traveled along the ground.



Homework Equations



## W = Fdcos\phi ##




The Attempt at a Solution



I found ## tan\theta = \mu_k ## by finding the derivative of a with respect to ##\theta ## and let it equal 0.

## a = \frac{F}{m}cos\theta - \mu_k (g - \frac{F}{m}sin\theta) = 0 ##

I think ## F = \mu_k F_N ## is a minimum when ## \frac{dF}{dx} = 0 ## and ##\frac{d^2F}{dx^2} > 0 ## . Is this correct? If so how do I use this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What rope ?
 
A case is being pulled along horizontal ground by means of a rope
 
patrickmoloney said:

Homework Statement



Using the relation ## tan \theta = \mu_k ## what angle should the rope make with the horizontal
in order to minimize the work done per unit distance traveled along the ground.



Homework Equations



## W = Fdcos\phi ##




The Attempt at a Solution



I found ## tan\theta = \mu_k ## by finding the derivative of a with respect to ##\theta ## and let it equal 0.

## a = \frac{F}{m}cos\theta - \mu_k (g - \frac{F}{m}sin\theta) = 0 ##

I think ## F = \mu_k F_N ## is a minimum when ## \frac{dF}{dx} = 0 ## and ##\frac{d^2F}{dx^2} > 0 ## . Is this correct? If so how do I use this?

Someone else just asked this exact question in the forum already, and we answered it there if you want to look at it.
 
proving ##tan\theta = \mu_k ## is the first part of the question. That is for a maximum not a minimum. The third part is 'what angle should the rope make with the horizontal in order to minimize the work done per unit distance traveled along the ground'
 
patrickmoloney said:

Homework Statement



Using the relation ## tan \theta = \mu_k ## what angle should the rope make with the horizontal
in order to minimize the work done per unit distance traveled along the ground.

Homework Equations



## W = Fdcos\phi ##

The Attempt at a Solution



I found ## tan\theta = \mu_k ## by finding the derivative of a with respect to ##\theta ## and let it equal 0.

## a = \frac{F}{m}cos\theta - \mu_k (g - \frac{F}{m}sin\theta) = 0 ##

I think ## F = \mu_k F_N ## is a minimum when ## \frac{dF}{dx} = 0 ## and ##\frac{d^2F}{dx^2} > 0 ## . Is this correct? If so how do I use this?
The derivatives should be with respect to θ, not w.r.t. x .

You most likely want the acceleration to be zero.
 
I get to ## F = \frac{\mu_k mg}{cos\theta + \mu_k sin\theta} ## and I don't think it's correct cause I'm not able to get an elegant derivative for it.
 
how would I go about differentiating the work ## W ## with respect to ## \theta ## ?
 
patrickmoloney said:
how would I go about differentiating the work ## W ## with respect to ## \theta ## ?

You would want to differentiate the force equation after you have written in terms of ##\theta##.
 
  • #10
patrickmoloney said:
how would I go about differentiating the work ## W ## with respect to ## \theta ## ?
Work per unit distance traveled is Fcosθ , isn't it ?

That's a bit nicer looking expression.

Use maybe the quotient rule ?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K