What is the Partial Derivative of Metric in Gravitational Action?

  • Thread starter Thread starter krishna mohan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derivative Metric
krishna mohan
Messages
114
Reaction score
0
Could someone tell me what would be the partial derivative...

\frac{ d g_{ab} }{ d g_{cd}}

??
Such expressions occur when one does variations of gravitational action...

Note: For some reason, the d needed for derivative is not appearing in the post...although it was visible in the preview...
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Depends on exactly what you're doing, but if you're doing a variation in which all 10 components of g are independent, then your expression is equal to δac δbd, or more precisely the symmetrized version of that,
ac δbd + δad δbc)/2
 
Okay...

But if a is not equal to b, then won't the symmetrised version have an unwanted factor of (1/2)?

i.e if a=c and b=d, one would like to have 1 as the answer...but the symmetrised version would give 1/2...
 
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Abstract The gravitational-wave signal GW250114 was observed by the two LIGO detectors with a network matched-filter signal-to-noise ratio of 80. The signal was emitted by the coalescence of two black holes with near-equal masses ## m_1=33.6_{-0.8}^{+1.2} M_{⊙} ## and ## m_2=32.2_{-1. 3}^{+0.8} M_{⊙}##, and small spins ##\chi_{1,2}\leq 0.26 ## (90% credibility) and negligible eccentricity ##e⁢\leq 0.03.## Postmerger data excluding the peak region are consistent with the dominant quadrupolar...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
Back
Top