What is the PMF of a sum of two discrete random variables?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Alupsaiu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sum
Alupsaiu
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I'm working a problem and I'm stuck on one part. Consider, X and Y, two independent discrete random variables who have the same geometric pmf. Show that for all n ≥ 2, the PMF

P(X=k|X+Y=n) is uniform.

Now, this equals: P(X=k)P(Y=n-k)/P(X+Y=n), which follows from the definition of conditional probability. Since the X and Y have the same geometric pmf the numerator is easy to calculate, but I'm stuck on what exactly P(X+Y=n) is. I know it's the joint PMF, but how can I relate it to the problem (i.e. to the fact that X and Y have the same geo PMF, that X and Y are independent etc). Any help is appreciated.

Thanks,
Alex
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To be more specific, the problem is to show for any integer n≥2
 
Hey Alupsaiu and welcome to the forums.

What are finding difficult about the P(X + Y = n)?

You are given the realization of X (X = k), and you are given n, so based on that you should be able to get the realization of Y to figure out your probability.

That probability is just the probability that given n, it represents the probability that X = k and Y = n - k, In other words it is the same as saying P(X = k, Y = n - k).
 
Hey, thanks for the reply. I figured the problem out a while ago, I don't know exactly why I found it confusing, long day I suppose haha. Thanks for the help though!
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top