What is the principle behind Michelson interferometer?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Physicsissuef
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Michelson
Physicsissuef
Messages
908
Reaction score
0
Hello people!

I got big problem.

l=\frac{ct_n}{2} - the light in one way.

Here are the pictures, I think you'll see what I am talking about.

http://img218.imageshack.us/my.php?image=picture001id5.jpg

http://img135.imageshack.us/my.php?image=picture002tx5.jpg

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/e7/Interferometer.svg

Please help!

Thank you!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Physicsissuef said:
l=\frac{ct_n}{2} - the light in one way.

This equations says (apparently) that light travels a distance 2l. A-to-M2, and M2-to-A1, are each a distance l.
Perhaps they are assuming very small angles, so that M2-to-B is approximately l also. You're right, they can't all be exactly equal to l.
 
Why they aren't using Pitagorean theorem? If they use Pitagorean theorem, "x" or "l" (as they say) would be \frac{t_nc\sqrt{1-\frac{v^2}{c^2}}}{2}, right?
 
Physicsissuef said:
Why they aren't using Pitagorean theorem? If they use Pitagorean theorem, "x" or "l" (as they say) would be \frac{t_nc\sqrt{1-\frac{v^2}{c^2}}}{2}, right?

Rearrange your expression

l = \frac{t_nc\sqrt{1-\frac{v^2}{c^2}}}{2} \quad _{(1)}

to get

t_n = \frac{2l}{c}\left(1-\frac{v^2}{c^2} \right)^{-1/2} \quad _{(2)}

then that is exactly what I see in the photographed text at the bottom of the your first image.
 
Last edited:
Also: the red "l"s in the first image are incorrect. Those distances are greater than l.

edit:
This contradicts my earlier post. I've since realized that the figure is in the reference frame of the "ether", in which those distances (A-to-M1) are greater than l. They are equal to l in the lab reference frame only.
 
Last edited:
I think the second picture is where the Michelson interferometer is in the ether. So the real distances are "l", but when the Michelson interferometer is on the earth, also there is effect from the ground, and the light "turns" by some angle, so those "l"-s on the first pictures are actually greater then "l", and the normal distance is "l".
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...
Back
Top