I What is the Probability of a Sample Having Access to Clean Drinking Water?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter conrad dunk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    A level Stats
conrad dunk
Messages
7
Reaction score
3
Getting ahead with my S1 & S2 for my further maths mods next year, really stuck on this particular question, as there is no such successive trials etc, please help me solve, so i can make some actual sense of what the hell is going on! Cheers,

roughly that the portion of families with
access to clean drinking water is equal to 0.55. Find the probability that of a
sample n, over 40% will have clean drinking water i n=6 binomial
distribution, and ii n=600 Gaussian distribution
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Set ##p=0.55## to be the probability that a randomly chosen family will have access to clean water. For the first case you are asking the probability that 3, 4, 5 or 6 families will have access to clean water (that is over 40% of 6). So you essentially sum the probalities ##P(3)## to ##P(6)##, using thee formula for binomial distribution (probability mass function).

For the second case you use the cummulative distribution function for the gaussian distribution. The justification is the central limiting theorem, which allows you to approximate the binomial distribution by the normal distribution for large ##n##. You will need to calculate the mean and variance (formulas given by the binomial distribution). You may be given a table (you can use a graphical calculator or wolfram alpha) that allows you to compute the CDF. So in your case you need to compute ##1-CDF(240)##, which is the probability that over 40% of the 600 families will have access to clean water.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes conrad dunk
Hi lucas, thanks for your quick response, if possible please could show me the solution to the second the problem? I am new to gaussian, watched a few youtube tutorials, but I've been on this problem for a few hours now and just need to see how it's broken down and solved. Thanks again for your help Lucas!
 
  • Like
Likes Lucas SV
conrad dunk said:
Hi lucas, thanks for your quick response, if possible please could show me the solution to the second the problem? I am new to gaussian, watched a few youtube tutorials, but I've been on this problem for a few hours now and just need to see how it's broken down and solved. Thanks again for your help Lucas!

Sure! The mean is ##np=600*0.55=330## and the standard deviation is ##np(1-p)=600*0.55*0.45=148.5##. Then according to http://www.danielsoper.com/statcalc/calculator.aspx?id=53, with ##x=240=0.4*600##, I find essentially find the area under the normal distribution function from ##-\infty## to ##x##, to be ##0.2722##. The answer then is ##1-0.2722=0.728## (to 3 significant figures), which is the area under the graph from 240 to ##+\infty##. You can check the result in a table or a different calculator and it will be the same.

Note that the central limit theorem tells us that this is a good approximation for large enough ##n## and for ##x## which is sufficiently close to the mean. The reason why you approximate is because it requires a lot of computational power to compute probabilities exactly (the way you did in part a) for large ##n## in a binomial distribution (which describes the probability of ##k## successes in ##n## trials).
 
  • Like
Likes conrad dunk
Jesus Christ that makes sense, Lucas you are the man, thank you very much !
 
  • Like
Likes Lucas SV
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.
Back
Top