What is the probability of B being the first to hit the target?

  • Thread starter Thread starter guevara
  • Start date Start date
guevara
This might seem very basicto some of you, I'm just not a math person, and wondering if someone could help me with this:

A, B, and C shoot at a target in this order: ABCABCABCABC... until the target is hit. Each shot and each shooter is independent of each other. The probability that A hits the target is 4/5. The probability that B hits the target is 4/5. The probability that C hits the target is 1/3. What is the probability that the first person to hit the target is B?

Could anyone explain how you do this?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
For any cycle, the event that B hits first is A miss followed by B hit (prob = 4/25). The prob that all three miss on a cycle is 2/75.
The net result is that the prob that B hits first is
(4/25)*(1+2/75+(2/75)2+ ...)=(4/25)*(75/73)=12/73.
 
Thanks a lot, but could I ask for the logic behind the (1+2/75+(2/75)^2) part? I'd highly appreciate it.
 
The probability that everyone misses on a given "cycle" is
(1/5)(1/5)(2/3)= 2/75. That's the number in the series.

The "1" is if B hits on the first cycle.
"2/75" would be where everyone misses on the first cycle, then B hits on the second.
"(2/75)^2" is where everyone misses on the first two cycles, B hits on the third.
...
"(2/75)^n" would be everyone missing on the first n cycles, B hits on the next.

Of course, that forms a geometric series so it is easy to sum.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
5K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Back
Top