What is the Probability of Non-Overlapping Coins on a Rectangular Carpet?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Physics_wiz
  • Start date Start date
Physics_wiz
Messages
227
Reaction score
0
I remmeber reading before in a probability book that this is an unsolved problem (I don't know if it still is or not):

Given a rectangular carpet with dimensions m x n, find the probability that a coin with radius r will fall on the carpet without touching another coin that's already on the carpet (number of coins on the carpet would have to be known I guess).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It reminded me about the Buffon's Needle Problem: "Buffon's needle problem asks to find the probability that a needle of length l will land on a line, given a floor with equally spaced parallel lines a distance d apart. The problem was first posed by the French naturalist Buffon Eric Weisstein's World of Biography in 1733 (Buffon 1733, pp. 43-45), and reproduced with solution by Buffon in 1777 (Buffon 1777, pp. 100-104)." (http://mathworld.wolfram.com/BuffonsNeedleProblem.html) .
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I found the book where I read that problem. Here's what the problem is:

"We have a rectangular carpet and an indefinete supply of perfect pennies. What is the probability that if we drop the pennies on the carpet at random no two of them will overlap?"

The book says this one hasn't been solved yet, but gives the answer to the one dimensional problem: "Drop n needles of length h on a stick of length b at random. What's the probability that no two needles overlap?"

The answer is [(b-nh)/(b-h)]^n if b>=nh or 0 if b<nh

Any ideas about the first problem? I was thinking: if the one dimensional answer is given, then why not replace each penny by a cross and find the probability that the vertical line will have the same y coordinate as another vertical line then find the probability that the horizontal line will have the same x coordinate as another then multiply them together?
 
Physics_wiz said:
Any ideas about the first problem? I was thinking: if the one dimensional answer is given, then why not replace each penny by a cross and find the probability that the vertical line will have the same y coordinate as another vertical line then find the probability that the horizontal line will have the same x coordinate as another then multiply them together?

A different, simpler approach may be this:
- replace all coins with the center of the coin
- find the distance D_ij between all pairs of n points, so i:1 to n, j:1 to n, but j not equal to i
- what is the probability that all D_ij>2r (no overlaps)

It seems to me that this should be a solvable problem, if I integrate like the approach to Buffon's Needle.

Is there some feature I am missing that makes it unsolvable?
 
kfmfe04 said:
A different, simpler approach may be this:
- replace all coins with the center of the coin
- find the distance D_ij between all pairs of n points, so i:1 to n, j:1 to n, but j not equal to i
- what is the probability that all D_ij>2r (no overlaps)

It seems to me that this should be a solvable problem, if I integrate like the approach to Buffon's Needle.

Is there some feature I am missing that makes it unsolvable?

I don't know but I think at some point you need to calculate every possible arrangement of n coins on the surface available that satisfies your conditions. Of course, the problem doesn't specify how big the carpet is or how small the coins are. Therefore, choose a very small carpet and very big coins. (Actually you want to calculate the probability that coins will be in contact and subtract that from one. Also, the probability is always conditional on the state of the event space at time t(i)).
 
Last edited:
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top