What is the Quotient Group S/S1?

  • Thread starter Thread starter millwallcrazy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Subgroup
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding quotient groups, specifically G/H, where G is a group and H is a subgroup. Participants explore examples such as S3/H, GL(n,R)/GL+(n,R), and the dihedral group D4/H, emphasizing the computation of cosets and the index [G:H]. Key points include that the identity in G/H is H, and the number of cosets corresponds to the index, which can be finite or infinite. The conversation also highlights the distinction between finite and infinite groups, particularly in the context of GL(n,R) and GL+(n,R). Understanding these concepts is essential for determining the structure of quotient groups.
millwallcrazy
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Does anybody know a general method to find the Group G/H (Where G is a Group and H is a subgroup of G)

For example

(1) What is the group S3/H ?

S3 = {e, a, a^2, b, ab, (a^2)b} (Permutation group of order 6)
H =< a >= {e, a, a^2} is a cyclic subgroup of G

(2) What is the group GL(n,R)/GL+(n;R)?

GL(n,R) = { nxn Matrices with real entries whose determinants are not zero}
GL+(n;R)= { nxn matrices with real entries whose determiants are positive}

(3) Consider the dihedral group D4 =< a, b >= {e, a, a^2, a^3, b, ab, (a^2)b, (a^3)b}
Find the groups D4/H where H is a normal proper subgroup of D4

(4) Consider S to be the set of all transformations on R such that if x belongs to R
s : x --> x' = ax + b
with a, b real numbers and a not = 0.
Let S1 be all transformations of the form x --> x' = x+b and S2 be all transformations
of the form x --> x' = ax
S/S1 is a group, which group is it?

Help will be greatly appreciated
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
All those examples are manageable with direct computation. The elements of G/H are all pairwise disjoint, and the identity is H. Furthermore, if G is finite, [G : H] = |G / H| = |G| / |H|. For example in S3 = {e, a, a^2, b, ab, (a^2)b}, H = {e, a, a^2}, since |G / H| = 2, [G : H] = 2, so there is only one other coset aside from H in G/H, and it has to be {b,ab, (a^2)b}. (2) and (3) are almost identically solved.


(4): If F (x) = ax + b, what is F*S1?
 
Just a few things.

What is [G : H]?
Why is it that you said the identity is H?
As the only other coset aside from H is {b,ab, (a^2)b} how does this then determine what G/H is? you have only found two cosets...and not the group G/H?

Last thing. How is this identical to (2) because GL (n,R) and GL +(n,R) have infinite order right? so you can't use the same [G : H] = |G / H| = |G| / |H|

thanks
 
1) Up to isomorphism, how many groups have order 2?
2) How many groups satisfy the property that the product of any two non-identity elements is the identity?
 
millwallcrazy said:
Just a few things.

What is [G : H]?
Why is it that you said the identity is H?
As the only other coset aside from H is {b,ab, (a^2)b} how does this then determine what G/H is? you have only found two cosets...and not the group G/H?

Last thing. How is this identical to (2) because GL (n,R) and GL +(n,R) have infinite order right? so you can't use the same [G : H] = |G / H| = |G| / |H|

thanks

[G : H] is the index of the subgroup H in G. I.e., the number of cosets induced by H (this can be infinite).

You are aware that if G is finite and H normal in G, |G / H| = |G| / |H| right? Each coset is of the same size and disjoint from the others, and each element of G falls into a coset of H, so it follows that there must be |G| / |H| of them. Also, in G/H, the identity element is H, this you should know.

"As the only other coset aside from H is {b,ab, (a^2)b} how does this then determine what G/H is?" G/H is the group consisting of the cosets of H in G, with the group operation defined as aH*bH = abH and identity H.

Although in (2) the two groups are infinite, [G : H] = 2, which is what you really need to know.
 
in (2) the groups are infinite, how does that mean that [G:H] = 2?
 
[G : H] is the size of G/H. It can be finite, even if G and H are both infinite. Can you see why G/H consists of precisely 2 elements in (2)?
 
No i am not sure why G/H only consists of only 2 precise elements in (2)? Could you please explain why?
 
I can't give you full out explanations, it's against the forum's policies. Rather than that, I can point you in the right direction:

GL(n,R)/GL+(n;R) has identity GL+(n;R), so we know of one of its elements. Now let GL-(n;R) be the set of matrices with negative determinant. Can you prove this is the only other element in GL(n,R)/GL+(n;R)? First prove that it actually is a coset, and next prove that an element of GL(n,R) is in either GL+(n;R) or GL-(n;R) (this is immediate by the definition of those sets).
 

Similar threads

Back
Top