What is the radiation weight factor?

  • Thread starter Thread starter gungo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Radiation Weight
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the radiation weight factor (wR) for beta particles based on their effectiveness compared to X-rays in destroying a bacterial population. A dose of 5 Gy of X-rays achieves a 63% kill rate, while only 1 Gy of beta particles is needed for the same effect. The conclusion drawn is that the wR for beta particles is 5, indicating they are five times more effective in causing damage. Participants emphasize the importance of discerning relevant information in problem-solving rather than assuming all data provided is necessary. Understanding the relationship between dose and effectiveness is crucial for accurately determining radiation weight factors.
gungo
Messages
27
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


A dose of 5 Gy of X-rays is required to destroy 63% of a particular bacterial population. It requires 1 Gy of beta particles of mean energy 1.0 MeV to accomplish the same result. What is the wR for the beta particles in this population of bacteria?

Homework Equations


H= (wR) x (Dr)

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm assuming the dose (Dr) is the 5 Gy...is the equivalent does the 1 Gy because it says it accomplishes the same result? The answer is supposed to be 5 but doing that wouldn't give me 5, and I wouldn't be using all the information. I really don't know what else to do I haven't dealt with questions like these in class :(
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Beta particles (at this particular energy per beta particle) need only 1/5 the dose to deal the same damage. Their wR is 5: They deal damage 5 times as "efficient". That's it.
gungo said:
and I wouldn't be using all the information
Never assume that every number in a problem is relevant. That is a bad way to approach problems, especially as you won't have that sort of guidance for actual (non-homework) problems anyway. You have to determine which quantities are important and which are not based on the problem itself.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top