What is the radius of the circular arc in a sine curve trajectory?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the radius of curvature for a sine curve trajectory, particularly in the context of a particle moving along this path. The original poster attempts to relate the radius of curvature to centripetal acceleration and static friction, raising questions about how to derive the radius from the sine function.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the concept of radius of curvature, with some suggesting parameterization of the sine curve to find maximum curvature. Others question the assumptions made regarding the relationship between slope and curvature, particularly at points of local maxima.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the relationship between the radius of curvature and the sine function, with participants providing references and discussing the implications of curvature versus slope. Some guidance has been offered regarding the use of standard formulas for radius of curvature, but no consensus has been reached on the interpretation of results.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating complex mathematical expressions and relationships, with some expressing confusion over the implications of curvature at points where the slope is zero. The discussion includes references to external resources for further clarification.

Pushoam
Messages
961
Reaction score
53

Homework Statement


upload_2017-7-20_19-47-35.png


Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


Every small part of the trajectory can be taken as a circular arc.
Then,
$$\frac { m v^2} R ≤ kmg $$

But how to find out R from the sine-curve?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In general (for not simply circular motion) the radius of curvature (the R in your centripetal acceleration formula) is given by (one over) the magnitude of acceleration of a particle moving along the curve at the point with (always) unit speed.

For example a particle moving unit speed along a circle has acceleration 1/R so the radius of curvature is (surprise!) R.

Thus, to find the radius of curvature at any point on the sinusoid, we could parameterize x and y in time such that (dx/dt)^2+(dy/dt)^2=1 at all times, then the radius of curvature will be (one over) the acceleration in that parameterization.
But... we only care about the minimum radius of curvature, (i.e. maximum acceleration/curvature,) we don't care about it's value everywhere. So maybe we can save some trouble by realizing; where the curvature is maximum?
 
Hiero said:
In general (for not simply circular motion) the radius of curvature (the R in your centripetal acceleration formula) is given by (one over) the magnitude of acceleration of a particle moving along the curve at the point with (always) unit speed.
Please give me a reference for this information .
##\{{\frac {dx}{dt}}\}^2 +\{ {\frac {dy} {dt}}\}^2 = 1 ##
##\{{\frac {dx}{dt}}\}^2 + \{\left ({ {\frac {dy} {dx}} {\frac {dx} {dt}} }\right )^2## ##=\left ( {\frac a {\alpha}} \cos {\frac x{ \alpha }} {\frac {dx} {dt}}\right ) ^2\} = 1 ####\{{\frac {dx}{dt}}\}^2 = ## ##\frac 1{1+ \left ( {\frac a {\alpha}} \cos {\frac x{ \alpha }}\right)^2} ##

##\{{\frac {dy}{dt}}\}^2 = ## ## \frac { \{ {\frac a {\alpha} } \cos {\frac x { \alpha} } \}^2 } {1+ \left ( {\frac a {\alpha}} \cos {\frac x{ \alpha }}\right)^2} ##

Differentiating both sides wrt t,
## 2 v_x \ddot x = \frac{ -1} {\{ {1+\left ( {\frac a {\alpha}} \cos {\frac x{ \alpha }}\right)^2}\}^2 } {\frac a {{\alpha}^2}} \sin {\frac{2 x} \alpha} ##

## 2 v_y \ddot y = \{1 - \{ {\frac a {\alpha} } \cos {\frac x { \alpha} } \}^2\} \frac{ 1} {\{ {1+\left ( {\frac a {\alpha}} \cos {\frac x{ \alpha }}\right)^2}\}^2 } {\frac a {{\alpha}^2}} \sin {\frac{2 x} \alpha} ##

## 2 v_y \ddot y = \{1 - \{ {\frac a {\alpha} } \cos {\frac x { \alpha} } \}^2\} 2 v_x \ddot x##
##\frac {dx} {dt}= \sqrt {\frac 1{1+ \left ( {\frac a {\alpha}} \cos {\frac x{ \alpha }}\right)^2}} ##

Is this correct so far?
 
Last edited:
Pushoam said:
Please give me a reference for this information .
Sorry I think that wasn't the simplest way to put it, but @haruspex's link is worth looking at; it is what I had in mind in my first reply.

The question is asking, if we let a car travel in this certain path at a constant speed, what is the maximum constant speed at which it won't slip? So then at some point(s) on the curve we must want static friction to be acting at it's maximum (or else the car could've gone a bit faster). If we can confidently determine which point(s) along the curve it should be maximum, then we can save ourselves trouble by considering the motion at a single point rather than considering the entire curve.
 
##\frac{ m v^2} R ≤ kmg ##
##v≤ \sqrt {k g R} ##
So, the maximum allowed speed is ##v_{mx} = \sqrt { k g R_{mn} }##
where Rmn is the minimum radius of curvature
If the curve is given in Cartesian coordinates as y(x), then the radius of curvature is (assuming the curve is differentiable up to order 2):
## R = | \frac { \left ( 1 + y' ^2\right )^ \frac 3 2 } { y" }| ##
upload_2017-7-26_17-53-45.png
upload_2017-7-26_17-54-56.png
upload_2017-7-26_18-31-8.png
upload_2017-7-26_18-31-52.png
upload_2017-7-26_18-46-17.png
upload_2017-7-26_20-55-58.png
Rmn, turns out to be radius of curvature at that point where Sine function has maximum value. So, the curve is a straight line. And radius of curvature of straight line is infinity, right? So, where am I wrong?

I copied these latex codes from mathematica. Now how to bring it in the standard form?
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{amsmath, amssymb, graphics, setspace}

\newcommand{\mathsym}[1]{{}}
\newcommand{\unicode}[1]{{}}

\newcounter{mathematicapage}
\begin{document}

\begin{doublespace}
\noindent\(\pmb{\text{}}\)
\end{doublespace}

\begin{doublespace}
\noindent\(\pmb{\text{}}\)
\end{doublespace}

\begin{doublespace}
\noindent\(\pmb{\text{}}\\
\pmb{}\\
\pmb{y= a \text{Sin}[x/\alpha ]}\)
\end{doublespace}

\begin{doublespace}
\noindent\(a \text{Sin}\left[\frac{x}{\alpha }\right]\)
\end{doublespace}

\begin{doublespace}
\noindent\(\pmb{y'= D[y,x]}\)
\end{doublespace}

\begin{doublespace}
\noindent\(\frac{a \text{Cos}\left[\frac{x}{\alpha }\right]}{\alpha }\)
\end{doublespace}

\begin{doublespace}
\noindent\(\pmb{y\text{''} = D[y',x ]}\)
\end{doublespace}

\begin{doublespace}
\noindent\(-\frac{a \text{Sin}\left[\frac{x}{\alpha }\right]}{\alpha ^2}\)
\end{doublespace}

\begin{doublespace}
\noindent\(\pmb{R = \{(1+ y' {}^{\wedge}2){}^{\wedge}(3/2 ) \}/y\text{''}}\)
\end{doublespace}

\begin{doublespace}
\noindent\(\left\{-\frac{\alpha ^2 \left(1+\frac{a^2 \text{Cos}\left[\frac{x}{\alpha }\right]^2}{\alpha ^2}\right)^{3/2} \text{Csc}\left[\frac{x}{\alpha }\right]}{a}\right\}\)
\end{doublespace}

\begin{doublespace}
\noindent\(\pmb{\text{DSolve}[R'[x] =0, x]}\)
\end{doublespace}
 

Attachments

  • upload_2017-7-26_17-54-21.png
    upload_2017-7-26_17-54-21.png
    11.9 KB · Views: 447
  • upload_2017-7-26_18-30-23.png
    upload_2017-7-26_18-30-23.png
    10.3 KB · Views: 451
Last edited:
Pushoam said:
So, the maximum allowed speed is ##v_{mx} = \sqrt { k g R_{mn} }##
where Rmn is the minimum radius of curvature
Yes.
If the curve is given in Cartesian coordinates as y(x), then the radius of curvature is (assuming the curve is differentiable up to order 2):
##R = | \frac { \left ( 1 + y' ^2\right )^ \frac 3 2 } { y" }|##
OK

Rmn, turns out to be radius of curvature at that point where Sine function has maximum value.
Yes. It's not hard to prove it without a computer. If you inspect the expression for R as a function of x for this specific y(x), you can see that the denominator attains its maximum value at the same point that the numerator attains its minimum value.

So, the curve is a straight line.
I'm not sure what you are saying here. What curve are you referring to?
 
Last edited:
I am referring to that curve for which I have calculated Rmn.
I have got Rmn at that point for which Sine function has its local maximum. At the point of local maximum the slope is zero. Slope being zero implies that the curve is a straight line.

1.91 irodov picture.png
 
Last edited:
Pushoam said:
Slope being zero implies that the curve is a straight line.
Why wouldn't a slope of 1 also imply that the curve is a straight line?
Knowing the value of the slope of a curve at some point does not tell you anything about the curvature at that point. Rotating the whole curve rigidly would change the slope values but would not change the curvature values.
 
  • #10
TSny said:
Why wouldn't a slope of 1 also imply that the curve is a straight line?
Knowing the value of the slope of a curve at some point does not tell you anything about the curvature at that point. Rotating the whole curve rigidly would change the slope values but would not change the curvature values.

What I want to say that even the upper part of a circle has maximum at some point say(x0 , y0 ). And if I use the above formula for calculating the Radius of curvature , then around (x0 , y0 ), the curve is a straight line with slope zero and a straight line has an infinite radius of curvature. I am having some confusion here.
 
  • #11
Approximating a small region of a curve by a straight line is going too far when you are interested in the curvature. Curvature is related to approximating a small region of a curve by a "best fitting" circular arc. The radius of curvature is then the radius of this arc. The slope involves only the first derivative of the function. But curvature requires knowledge of the second derivative (that is, how the slope is changing as you move along the curve).

Note that at a point where ##y'(x) = 0##, ##R = \frac 1 {|y''(x)|}##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Pushoam
  • #12
Do you actually need to find the radius of curvature ?

Can this problem be solved more elegantly by considering the lateral acceleration of the car directly ?
 
  • #13
Pushoam said:
What I want to say that even the upper part of a circle has maximum at some point say(x0 , y0 ). And if I use the above formula for calculating the Radius of curvature , then around (x0 , y0 ), the curve is a straight line with slope zero and a straight line has an infinite radius of curvature. I am having some confusion here.
Yes, the slope is zero, but that is just y'. Your straight line there is just the tangent. Putting y'=0 in your formula does not give infinity. You need to calculate y" and plug that in too. (If that were zero then it would be a straight line.)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Pushoam
  • #14
Nidum said:
Do you actually need to find the radius of curvature ?

Can this problem be solved more elegantly by considering the lateral acceleration of the car directly ?
What is a lateral acceleration and how to relate it with the problem?

What about the following in post #6?
Pushoam said:
I copied these latex codes from mathematica. Now how to bring it in the standard form?
 
Last edited:
  • #15
Nidum said:
Can this problem be solved more elegantly by considering the lateral acceleration of the car directly ?
Do you mean ##\ddot y##? The constant speed condition makes that a bit tricky.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 81 ·
3
Replies
81
Views
8K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K