What is the Range of a Twice Differentiable Function?

  • Thread starter Thread starter klen
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function Range
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a twice differentiable function defined on the interval [0,1] with boundary conditions f(0)=f(1)=0. The function is subject to a differential inequality involving its second derivative, first derivative, and the function itself, compared to the exponential function e^x. Participants are exploring the implications of this inequality on the possible values of f(x) for 0

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to manipulate the given inequality by integrating and transforming it into a form involving the exponential function. Some participants suggest defining a new function g(x) to simplify the analysis of the second derivative. Others question the steps taken in deriving certain expressions and seek clarification on the reasoning behind them.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, offering various approaches and questioning each other's reasoning. While some guidance has been provided, there is no clear consensus on the next steps or the implications of the derived inequalities.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes references to specific boundary conditions and the nature of the function being analyzed, which may influence the interpretations and assumptions being made. There is also mention of a related series question, indicating a broader context of mathematical exploration.

klen
Messages
40
Reaction score
1
A function f :[0,1]→ℝ is twice differentiable with f(0)=f(1)=0 such that

f''(x) - 2f'(x) + f(x) ≥ e^x, x ε [0,1].

Then for 0<x<1 which of the following is true
0<f(x)<∞, -1/2<f(x)<1/2, -1/4<f(x)<1, -∞<f(x)<0.

I tried to solve it in the following way:
I tried to take the e^x to the left side and found that the equation becomes,
[(e^-x)f'(x) - (e^-x)f(x)]' ≥ 1, thus on integration,

(e^-x)f'(x) - (e^-x)f(x) -f'(0) ≥ x which is same as

[(e^-x)f(x)]' ≥ x on integration

(e^-x)f(x) ≥ (x^2)/2 + f'(0)x.
I don't know how to proceed from here.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi klen! :smile:

(try using the X2 button just above the Reply box :wink:)
klen said:
(e^-x)f(x) ≥ (x^2)/2 + f'(0)x.

or you could say let g(x) = e-xf(x) …

then g''(x) ≥ 1 :wink:

(btw, how did you get on with your series question?)
 
Hi Tiny Tim,

Thanks for the help.

in the series question, we can break the sum as groups of four, like this:
S_n = \sum_{k=1}^{4} {(-1)^{k(k+1)/2}}{k^2} + \sum_{k=5}^{8} {(-1)^{k(k+1)/2}}{k^2} + ...
and so on,
in each of these sums the first two are negative terms and last two are positive,
so the sum evaluates to,
S_n = \sum_{k=0}^{n} {(32k-12)}
this gives the sum to be
S_n= {16n^2+4n}
which is possible only for first and fourth values.
 
excellent! :smile:

(good LaTeX too :wink:)
 
klen said:
in each of these sums the first two are negative terms and last two are positive,
so the sum evaluates to,
S_n = \sum_{k=0}^{n} {(32k-12)}

How do you get to this step? :confused:
 
In these sums for the first terms we have k=1,5,9...
so k is of form k=4i-3, i=1,2,3...
similarly for the next successive terms k is of form 4i-2, 4i-1, 4i.
Since the first two terms are positive and last two are negative we have,
S_n= \sum_{i=1}^n {-(4i-3)^2} + \sum_{i=1}^n {-(4i-2)^2} + \sum_{i=1}^n {(4i-1)^2} + \sum_{i=1}^n {(4i)^2}
which after solving comes,
S_n= \sum_{i=1}^n {(32i-12)}
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
klen said:
In these sums for the first terms we have k=1,5,9...
so k is of form k=4i-3, i=1,2,3...
similarly for the next successive terms k is of form 4i-2, 4i-1, 4i.
Since the first two terms are positive and last two are negative we have,
S_n= \sum_{i=1}^n {-(4i-3)^2} + \sum_{i=1}^n {-(4i-2)^2} + \sum_{i=1}^n {(4i-1)^2} + \sum_{i=1}^n {(4i)^2}
which after solving comes,
S_n= \sum_{i=1}^n {(32i-12)}

That was cool! :cool:

Thanks! :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K