What is the reaction force of centripetal force

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of centripetal force, its relationship with tension in a rope during circular motion, and the nature of centrifugal force as a pseudo-force. Participants explore the implications of Newton's third law in both inertial and non-inertial frames of reference.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that the tension in the rope provides the centripetal force necessary for circular motion, while questioning whether this tension has a corresponding reaction force.
  • Others argue that in an inertial frame, centripetal force is simply the tension, and there is no separate reaction force, while in a non-inertial frame, centrifugal force is introduced as a pseudo-force.
  • A later reply suggests that the experience of centrifugal force is a result of being in a non-inertial frame, and questions whether this invalidates Newton's laws.
  • Some participants clarify that tension is a real force generated by the molecules in the rope, implying that it must have a reaction force associated with it.
  • There is a discussion about whether the reaction force for centripetal force is the force from the rope, with some indicating that tension acts as a medium for providing centripetal force.
  • Participants also reference external sources to differentiate between reactive centrifugal force and the modern understanding of centrifugal force as an inertial force in rotating frames.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of centripetal force and its reaction force, with no clear consensus reached. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of these forces in different frames of reference.

Contextual Notes

Some limitations include the dependence on definitions of forces, the distinction between inertial and non-inertial frames, and the unresolved nature of the relationship between tension and reaction forces.

Zynoakib
Messages
70
Reaction score
0
According to Newton's 3rd law, force exists in pair. When I attach a ball to a rope and rotate it, I am giving the ball an centripetal force to keep it moving in circular motion, so is the tension in the string the reaction force I am asking?

I also want to ask about the reason why centrifugal force is considered as a pseudo-force. My explanation is that when you stand on the ball (imagine), you experience both the centripetal force (because you are rotating with the ball) and the centrifugal force (because you feel a force pushing you outward), but noting is actually providing the centrifugal force, and this also makes the rotating frame of reference an non-inertial frame. Is it correct?

Thanks!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Centripetal force is not a new kind of force . It only refers to that force which is reponsible for circular motion of an object - In this case , the tension .

*In inertial frame -
Tension is not equal to some other force mw2r . Acceleration is caused due to tension and this tension is simply equal to m*a , and a = w2r .

*In non inertial frame of the ball , you now add a pseudo force , simply following Newton's law for the non-inertial frame .
You call this force the centrifugal force .

Zynoakib said:
My explanation is that when you stand on the ball (imagine), you experience both the centripetal force (because you are rotating with the ball) and the centrifugal force (because you feel a force pushing you outward), but the centrifugal force should theoretically cancel the centripetal force, making the circular motion impossible and violating the law of motion (because you are still rotating with the ball), which also makes the rotating frame of reference an non-inertial frame. Is it correct?

It doesn't make the circular motion impossible . Would you consider your accelerating car ( from inertial frame ) to be moving while sitting in it ( a non inertial frame ) ?
Now , coming to your question , if you sat on the ball , would you see the ball accelerating ? As you said , Fnet = 0 and I just said , a =0 .

So is Newton's law being invalidated ?

*Just so you know , there's a like button near the bottom which you can press if somebody's post helps .:cool:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Zynoakib
Just to check my concept, in inertial frame where F = ma is obeyed, there is no reaction force for centripetal force because the force is just tension, while in non-inertial frame, centrifugal force is added to "balance" the centripetal force as stated by the Newton 3rd law; otherwise, the law will be invalidated.

Hope its correct this time

Thanks anyway
 
Zynoakib said:
you experience both the centripetal force (because you are rotating with the ball)
You may not experience. You just feel like something pull you out, which you stated it after this, a pseudo force. This experience is one of the key for Einstein to establish General Relativity.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Zynoakib
Zynoakib said:
there is no reaction force for centripetal force because the force is just tension
Of course not, for tension is made by the molecules on the rope! It's a real force so it must have a reaction, which is the force from the rope.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Zynoakib
tommyxu3 said:
Of course not, for tension is made by the molecules on the rope! It's a real force so it must have a reaction, which is the force from the rope.
so does that mean the reaction force for centripetal force is the force from the rope, and tension is kind of like a "medium" to provide centripetal force?
 
tommyxu3 said:
Of course not, for tension is made by the molecules on the rope! It's a real force so it must have a reaction, which is the force from the rope.

The tension is the centripetal force .
 
Qwertywerty said:
The tension is the centripetal force .
Yes, it is.
Zynoakib said:
so does that mean the reaction force for centripetal force is the force from the rope, and tension is kind of like a "medium" to provide centripetal force?
Yes. The rope makes the force, a centripetal force that the rope pulls you, so the reaction must be a force you pull the rope.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Zynoakib and Qwertywerty
Zynoakib said:
I am giving the ball an centripetal force to keep it moving in circular motion, so is the tension in the string the reaction force I am asking?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reactive_centrifugal_force

Zynoakib said:
I also want to ask about the reason why centrifugal force is considered as a pseudo-force. ...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Centrifugal_force

Note that these two are different things (see table in the first link). The modern use of "centrifugal force" usually means the later (inertial force existing in rotating frames only).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Zynoakib
  • #10
tommyxu3 said:
Yes. The rope makes the force, a centripetal force that the rope pulls you, so the reaction must be a force you pull the rope.

Yeah - that's correct .
 
  • #11
Thank you all guys I think I have had a better grasp of the concept!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K