What is the relationship between Earth's kinetic energy and a falling object?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter medical2
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Thinking
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between the kinetic energy of Earth and that of a falling object. Participants explore the comparison of kinetic energies in different contexts, questioning the relevance and implications of such a comparison.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes a comparison between the kinetic energy of Earth and that of a falling object, suggesting it could be equal to 0 or ∞ without clear reasoning.
  • Another participant questions the rationale behind comparing the kinetic energy of Earth to that of a falling object, asking for clarification on the frame of reference.
  • A participant expresses confusion about the comparison, noting they have seen comparisons between two falling objects and now want to include Earth in the discussion.
  • One participant attempts to clarify that kinetic energy is typically measured with respect to the ground and asks what alternative proposal is being suggested.
  • A participant introduces variables for the masses of the object and Earth, suggesting potential ratios for their kinetic energies but expresses difficulty in understanding the law of kinetic energy in this context.
  • Another participant points out that the kinetic energy of the falling object changes due to varying velocity from gravitational acceleration, emphasizing the need to specify the location or time for accurate measurement.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not appear to reach a consensus, as there are multiple interpretations of the comparison and varying levels of understanding regarding kinetic energy and reference frames.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the appropriate frame of reference for measuring kinetic energy and the implications of comparing the kinetic energies of Earth and a falling object. There are also unresolved questions about the assumptions underlying the proposed comparisons.

medical2
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
About my thinking ! Kenetic E"

last week i am thinking about the kenetic energy of the Earth compared with the object that falling down .

I assume that it may be equal to 0 or ∞ but no why ??

How about you for this case ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Not sure what you are asking about or why you'd compare the kinetic energy of the Earth (in what frame?) to the kinetic energy of a falling object.
 


Ohh sorry !

Hmm , i have ever seen comparison of the K.E of object 1 to K.E of object 2 while falling down . So in this case , i want to compared with the Earth instead of object 2.

thanks for answer , just doubt !
 


medical2 said:
Hmm , i have ever seen comparison of the K.E of object 1 to K.E of object 2 while falling down . So in this case , i want to compared with the Earth instead of object 2.
I'm still not understanding what you want to do. Usually, one measures the speed of the falling body--and thus its kinetic energy--with respect to the ground. What do you propose instead?
 


i assume that the object's mass is m Kg. and the Earth's mass is M Kg.
i want to know the kenetic of object respect to the Earth's while the object is falling .

it may be m/M or M/m or equal to 1 or 0 .


i try to understand to law of kenetic energy but it so hard of this case for me.
thanks for pay attention to my doubt.
 


the kinetic energy of the falling object is constantly changing because its velocity is changing due to the acceleration due to gravity. You must specify at what location/time you want to know the object's kinetic energy.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
4K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K