High School What is the relationship between spin and angular momentum in quantum mechanics?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The relationship between spin and angular momentum in quantum mechanics is defined by the intrinsic properties of particles such as quarks and electrons. While quarks do not physically "spin" like macroscopic objects, they possess internal angular momentum that contributes to the total angular momentum of a system. Spin is an SU(2) property, independent of space-time, while angular momentum is a space-time concept. Understanding this distinction is crucial for grasping the behavior of quantum particles within a center of momentum (CM) frame.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics terminology, including "spin" and "angular momentum."
  • Familiarity with SU(2) symmetry group and its implications in quantum physics.
  • Knowledge of center of momentum (CM) frame concepts.
  • Basic grasp of conserved quantities in physics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the mathematical framework of SU(2) and its applications in quantum mechanics.
  • Explore the concept of angular momentum in quantum systems through standard quantum mechanics textbooks.
  • Investigate the implications of intrinsic spin on particle interactions and conservation laws.
  • Learn about the differences between classical and quantum descriptions of rotational motion.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those focused on quantum mechanics, particle physics, and theoretical physics, will benefit from this discussion.

Ontophobe
Messages
60
Reaction score
1
The "color force" doesn't actually change the color of quarks because they don't actually have any color. We use the word "color" non-literally here. Now, I'm told that quarks don't "actually" "spin" either, so again, I infer that it's a term used out of convenience, but I'm also told that they do "actually" have angular momentum. How am I to divorce the concept of angular momentum from spin? In what sense do spinless entities have angular momentum? What do we even mean by "actually" in this particular context?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Angular momentum is a conserved quantity, so when we talk about angular momentum of particles and of macroscopic objects, we are talking about the same conserved quantity. To flip the spin of a large number of particles, you have to apply a torque somehow, so if you are in a closed system, the opposite reaction torque must go somewhere, perhaps causing the macroscopic structure to start rotating.

How do we tell if something is spinning? For a macroscopic object, we look at the object at successive points in time, and we see that it has rotated. But this technique doesn't work for a point particle like a quark or electron, since rotating a point does nothing. We need another definition of spin for quantum objects
 
Ontophobe said:
Now, I'm told that quarks don't "actually" "spin" either
What you have been told (correctly) is that they are not little tiny balls rotating about their axis the way the Earth rotates about its axis. However, they do have an internal angular momentum that contributes to the total angular momentum of the system of which they are part.
How am I to divorce the concept of angular momentum from spin?
You don't. Instead you have to divest yourself of the idea that only little balls rotating around an axis can have internal angular momentum.
 
The difference between intrinsic spin and angular momentum is that spin is an SU(2) property that exists independently of any space-time frame. Angular momentum, on the other hand, is a space-time concept. Spin can be interpreted as angular momentum only in a space-time frame. Angular momentum in a CM frame can be interpreted as spin in an SU(2) context.
 
What is a CM frame and and SU(2) context?
 
CM = center of momentum. (Net momentum is 0.)
SU(2) is a symmetry group that specifies the behavior of certain quantum numbers and how they combine (interpreted as angular momentum in a space-time context). It is mathematically related to the 3d spatial rotation group.
You should be able to find a more detailed explanation in any standard QM textbook.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
939
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
956
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K