What is the relationship between the perpendiculars in a 3D vector?

  • Thread starter Thread starter lionely
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the relationship between perpendiculars in a 3D vector context, specifically involving points P and Q in relation to a base defined by points A, B, C, and D. The k component is established as 5, while the j component is determined to be 4j, derived from the midpoint of DE, which is positioned over the intersection of diagonals OB and AC. The i component is calculated as 4, resulting from the difference between the lengths of OA (14) and DE (6), split evenly between the two sides.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of 3D vector components (i, j, k)
  • Knowledge of geometric relationships in 3D space
  • Familiarity with midpoint calculations
  • Basic skills in vector proof techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Study vector component breakdown in 3D geometry
  • Learn about geometric proofs involving perpendiculars
  • Explore midpoint theorem applications in 3D space
  • Review vector distance calculations between points
USEFUL FOR

Students studying geometry, particularly those focusing on 3D vectors, as well as educators and tutors assisting with vector-related homework and proofs.

lionely
Messages
574
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



pbul0.png


I'm confused ,here's ... my attempt..

all I know so far is the

the k component would be 5...
I have no idea what to do with the i and j
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
hi lionely! :smile:
lionely said:
all I know so far is the

the k component would be 5...
I have no idea what to do with the i and j

drop perpendiculars DP and EQ onto the base …

where are P and Q in relation to ABCD ? :wink:
 
Hint: Assume DE is located such that its midpoint is positioned directly over the intersection of the base diagonals OB and AC.
 
Hmm is DE is assumed to be at the mid point then.. for the j component that would be 4j

but the i? ... umm is it like the base below DE is 8 because DE is 6cm and OA is 14? so 14-6?
 
tiny-tim said:
hi lionely! :smile:


drop perpendiculars DP and EQ onto the base …

where are P and Q in relation to ABCD ? :wink:

when I dropped the perpendiculars they ended up being at the midpoints of the widths of the base
 
lionely said:
Hmm is DE is assumed to be at the mid point then.. for the j component that would be 4j

but the i? ... umm is it like the base below DE is 8 because DE is 6cm and OA is 14? so 14-6?

You had your answer in this post, but didn't realize it. 14 - 6 = 8, and this difference is split evenly between between the two sides. So the i component is 4.
 
hi lionely! :smile:

(just got up :zzz:)
lionely said:
when I dropped the perpendiculars they ended up being at the midpoints of the widths of the base

(we'll call them P and Q)

ok … so the next line in your proof would be to say what the distance PQ is

and then you can compare that with the length of the base :wink:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
8K
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
15K