MHB What is the result of evaluating this sequence challenge?

AI Thread Summary
The sequence of integers \( x_i \) is defined with \( x_i = i \) for \( 1 \leq i \leq 5 \) and \( x_i = (x_1 x_2 \cdots x_{i-1}) - 1 \) for \( i > 5 \). A correction was made regarding the definition's interval, acknowledging the need for clarity. Participants engaged in evaluating the expression \( x_1 x_2 \cdots x_{2011} - \sum_{i=1}^{2011} (x_i)^2 \). The discussion included thanks to a member for pointing out the error, and a solution was confirmed as correct. The thread highlights the importance of precise definitions in mathematical problems.
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
A sequence of integers ${x_i}$ is defined as follows:

$x_i=i$ for all $1<i<5$ and

$x_i=(x_1x_2\cdots x_{i-1})-1$ for $i>5$.

Evaluate $\displaystyle x_1x_2\cdots x_{2011}-\sum_{i=1}^{2011} (x_i)^2$.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
anemone said:
A sequence of integers ${x_i}$ is defined as follows:

$x_i=i$ for all $1<i<5$ and

$x_i=(x_1x_2\cdots x_{i-1})-1$ for $i>5$.

Evaluate $\displaystyle x_1x_2\cdots x_{2011}-\sum_{i=1}^{2011} (x_i)^2$.

Hi MHB,

I want to apologize for not checking the validity of the interval for this sequence because the first function should be defined at $1\le i \le 5$. But I wouldn't have noticed it if Euge didn't let me know of it. Therefore, I owe Euge a thank, and perhaps a cup of coffee as well?:o

The problem should read:

$x_i=i$ for all $1\le i \le5$ and

$x_i=(x_1x_2\cdots x_{i-1})-1$ for $i>5$.

Evaluate $\displaystyle x_1x_2\cdots x_{2011}-\sum_{i=1}^{2011} (x_i)^2$.
 
anemone said:
Hi MHB,

I want to apologize for not checking the validity of the interval for this sequence because the first function should be defined at $1\le i \le 5$. But I wouldn't have noticed it if Euge didn't let me know of it. Therefore, I owe Euge a thank, and perhaps a cup of coffee as well?:o

The problem should read:

$x_i=i$ for all $1\le i \le5$ and

$x_i=(x_1x_2\cdots x_{i-1})-1$ for $i>5$.

Evaluate $\displaystyle x_1x_2\cdots x_{2011}-\sum_{i=1}^{2011} (x_i)^2$.

Ok, here is my solution.

We have

$\displaystyle x_1 \cdots x_{2011} -\sum_{i = 1}^{2011} (x_i)^2$

$\displaystyle = x_1 \cdots x_{2011} - \sum_{i = 1}^{5} i^2 - \sum_{i = 6}^{2011} [(x_i - 1)(x_i + 1) + 1]$

$\displaystyle = x_1 \cdots x_{2011} - 55 -\sum_{i = 6}^{2011} (x_i - 1)x_1 \cdots x_{i - 1} - 2006$

$\displaystyle = x_1 \cdots x_{2011} - \sum_{i = 6}^{2011} (x_1 \cdots x_i - x_1 \cdots x_{i - 1}) - 2061$

$\displaystyle = x_1 \cdots x_{2011} - x_1 \cdots x_{2011} + 5! -2061$

$\displaystyle = -1941$.
 
Last edited:
Hey Euge!:)

Thanks for participating and your answer is correct! Well done!(Yes)
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top