What is the role of coercivity in modeling superconductors in Opera v15?

  • Thread starter Thread starter harmonizedmot
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Superconductor
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on modeling a magnetic coil array in Opera v15, specifically addressing the role of coercivity in superconductors like lead (Pb) at 4ºK. The user is uncertain about defining coercivity for superconducting materials, as the hysteresis curve for superconductors is not straightforward and may suggest an extremely small coercivity. The conversation highlights the complexity of type II superconductors, where the coercivity concept may not apply as it does for ferromagnetic materials. Additionally, it is noted that Opera v15 lacks a specific setting for superconductors, although it allows for defining materials with various properties and includes a quench simulator. Overall, the topic remains challenging and underexplored in available literature.
harmonizedmot
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I am modeling a magnetic coil array in Opera v15. My current project uses a CosΘ Coil inside a Metglas cylinder (Ferromagnetic) inside a Pb cylinder (Superconducting) at 4ºK. The method used to specify the a material in Opera is to specify the Coercivity and Relative Permeability.

If I had a hysteresis curve, then the coercivity would be the distance along the H axis from the origin to the leftmost intersection point of the curve. Correct? I need to define the coercivity of the Pb Shield for the program, which is superconducting. But the hysteresis plot for a superconductor doesn't really make sense to me. In my mind I see a very thin line and so I think the coercivity would be extremely small. Perhaps this question is silly (or I'm just a grad student) but I find that when I talk to Professors about it, they seem to want to avoid the topic.

I've researched for many hours online and haven't found what I am looking for.

Does this analysis seem correct? Are there any references online I could look at to help clarify this topic?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
i don't think you can ever really talk about coercivity for superconducting Pb.
Yes, you can probably make plots of something that suggest that you could define something similar, but remember that Pb is type II meaning the situation is quite tricky: the curve would look different depending on whether or not teh Pb was superconducting when the field was applied, the strength of the field compared to Bv1 etc.

In short. It is all quite messy.

I've never used Opera. Does the program explicitly allow you to defined superconducting screens?
 
Yeah, the concept of coercivity in this situation does seem out of place.

The experiment requires a B field of around 100mG (less than the Earth's), and I'm not even sure what the plan is to achieve that, considering Flux Pinning, but that is a whole other subject. We're going to turn on the field after it is superconducting because we want tangential fields from the coil at the SC surface.

f95toli said:
Does the program explicitly allow you to defined superconducting screens?

To define a material you may set it as Linear or Non-Linear and Isotropic, Packed or Anisotropic. Then if you select Non-Linear you may define a BH curve with up to 50 points or so. And for Anisotropic materials you may use tables or functions to define values. It has a nice user variable utility and the scripting language is rather easy to use. But there isn't a "Superconductor" setting or button. I've searched it's literature thoroughly and it does have a quench simulator but that is about as much superconductor specific coding the program has.
 
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
Back
Top