What is the role of degeneracies in the condition for optical gain?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the role of degeneracies in the condition for optical gain in laser physics, specifically the equation N_2/g_2 > N_1/g_1. Here, N_1 and N_2 represent the number of atoms in the lower and upper energy states, respectively, while g_1 and g_2 denote their degeneracies. The inclusion of degeneracies is crucial as it affects the probability of photon interactions with electrons in these states, thereby influencing the population inversion necessary for laser operation. For effective laser action, the condition must reflect that the number of stimulated emission events exceeds absorption events, leading to the conclusion that N_2/g_2 > N_1/g_1 is essential for achieving optical gain.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of laser physics principles
  • Familiarity with population inversion concepts
  • Knowledge of degeneracy in quantum states
  • Basic grasp of stimulated emission and absorption processes
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the mathematical derivation of population inversion in laser systems
  • Explore the concept of degeneracy in quantum mechanics
  • Read "Principles of Lasers" by O. Svelto for deeper insights
  • Investigate the impact of energy state distribution on laser performance
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in laser physics, optical engineers, and researchers focusing on laser technology and optical gain mechanisms.

James Brady
Messages
106
Reaction score
4
I'm a novice studying laser physics and I came a across the condition for optical gain:

\frac{N_2}{g_2} > \frac{N_1}{g_1}

This is a basic set up where N_1 is the number of atoms in the lower energy state and N_2 is the number of atoms in the higher energy state. g_1, and g_2 are the degeneracies for the two states respectively. I understand that for optical gain you need N_2 to be higher than N_1, but why are the degeneracies factored in? It seems like it the number of possible ways to be in a certain energy state shouldn't matter, only the number of states themselves.

Can someone explain why the degeneracies are in the denominators? I do not see why having many possible ways to obtain an energy state would effect that states relative population. Also, I guess the key term which we are trying to achieve for a laser is "population inversion" or having more atoms in the high state than the low state.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For now imagine there is only one electron sitting in one the degenerate levels in the upper energy state, where the degeneracy is ##g_2##-fold. Then one photon comes in, this photon will have ##1/g_2## chance of interacting with the single electron in the upper energy state. (This problem is analogous to that where one is throwing a dice, when the dice lands he will have 1/6 chance of getting, e.g. 2-dot surface facing up, 2/6 chance of getting 2-dot OR 5-dot surface facing up, and so on). Hence if there are ##N_2## electrons in the upper energy state, our previous photon will encounter an electron with ##N_2/g_2## chance. And remember interacting with upper state electron will trigger stimulated emission.
But there is also the lower energy state with ##g_1##-fold degeneracy. Using the same argument as above, if there are ##N_1## electrons, the incoming photon will encounter an electron from the lower state with ##N_1/g_1## chance, which means ##N_1/g_1## chance of triggering absorption.
The generalized definition for a population inversion is actually the number of emission events being larger than the absorption events, therefore for degenerate levels one must have ##N_2/g_2 > N_1/g_1##. If you want a more mathematical derivation, go check a book titled Principles of Laser by O. Svelto in the beginning of the first chapter.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: James Brady
Oh I actually kind of get it now, so pretty much adding degeneracy levels increases the area where the electron could be, thus making it harder to hit with the photon...?

Thank you for the book recommendation. I will look into that one.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
8K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
19K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K