What is the Role of Springs in Guitar Vibration?

  • Thread starter Thread starter cmmcnamara
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Spring Vibration
AI Thread Summary
Springs in guitar setups, particularly in tremolo systems, play a complex role in vibration transfer. The discussion highlights concerns about whether tremolo springs effectively carry string vibrations, as many believe they dissipate energy rather than enhance it. Modifications to bridge blocks with denser materials aim to prolong vibration, but the effectiveness of similar upgrades to spring claws is questioned. The intuition that springs dampen vibrations is supported by practices in recording studios, where springs are used to minimize interference. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the need for a deeper understanding of how springs influence sound production in guitars.
cmmcnamara
Messages
121
Reaction score
1
Hi all,

I have a bit of a practicality problem here I was hoping I could get community consensus regarding. This question revolves around vibration throughout a mechanical setup and I haven't exactly studied said topic in any sort of depth in my schooling yet (coming up winter quarter).

Essentially my problem revolves around a springs ability to carry a vibration. I am an avid guitar player and I constantly am shopping and browsing different guitar modifications. One of the modifications I have seen advertised seems to violate my intuition regarding the nature of springs. On a guitar the travel of the string vibrations go as follows:

Strings-->Bridge Saddles-->Bridge Block-->Tremolo Springs-->Spring Claw--->Wood Screws

There are many modifications revolving around the bridge block by replacing it with a denser type metal or just a larger massive block both with intention of increasing the length of the vibration throughout the chain once the player has stopped picking a note. This difference is subtle but is an excellent solution. However one other modification revolves around the same idea of heavier/denser metal being used in the spring claw to continue that vibration. My problem with this modification however is that I feel that once the vibration hits the tremolo springs in the chain, that most of the vibration is dissipated or negligible once it exits the springs. Now like I mentioned, intuitively it does not make sense to me that the springs would carry much or any of the vibration energy; in fact many recording studios suspend microphones by springs citing that very reason, so that the amount of room vibrations causes less interference with the microphones. However, intuition as we all know isn't always correct. I feel that this particular upgrade is just playing off the block upgrade's physical principles while really providing no advantage in the area it is intended. Can anyone who has a better understanding of this phenomenon set me straight on this? And as always the mathematics is always appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I suspect you have touched only a very few of the mysteries of such sound production.

Try this article for other subtelies..

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strativarius

Be sure to check the references... there is even an article on fungus treating a violin.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top