What is the science behind Bruce Depalma's Spinning Ball Anomaly?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Blutz33
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Anomaly Ball Spinning
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Bruce Depalma's Spinning Ball Anomaly posits that a spinning ball can achieve a height increase of up to 20% and fall faster than a non-spinning ball, even in a vacuum, eliminating drag as a factor. This phenomenon was observed during the 1970s and is suggested to have implications for early spacecraft launches, where both the USSR and the USA noted unexpected performance gains. The discussion raises questions about the lack of explanation from NASA regarding these findings, which some participants view as conspiracy theories lacking scientific validation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of classical mechanics and motion dynamics
  • Familiarity with the principles of angular momentum
  • Knowledge of vacuum conditions and their effects on physical experiments
  • Basic concepts of aerospace engineering and spacecraft dynamics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of angular momentum and its effects on motion
  • Explore experimental physics related to spinning objects
  • Investigate historical spacecraft performance anomalies during launches
  • Study NASA's published findings on spacecraft dynamics and propulsion
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, aerospace engineers, and anyone interested in the intersection of classical mechanics and space exploration will benefit from this discussion.

Blutz33
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
If you are reading this thread chances are you are familiar with Bruce Depalma's work and publishing's. If you are not i will briefly fill you in on the " Spinning ball Anomaly ". ([ crackpot link deleted ])

Back in the 70's Bruce Depalma did a series of tests involving spinning objects. In his published findings he goes on to describe that a ball spun at a high rate of speed will actually travel higher (Sometimes 20% higher) and fall faster then a ball that is not spinning. Now of course the balls are identical and launched at the same trajectory. So explain why the spinning ball goes higher?. This test was also done in a vacuum to go on and prove that drag couldn't have an effect on it. The deeper i look into Bruce Depalma's theory the more mind blowing it gets. Bruce Depalma's theory could link to early spaceship launches. In these early launches the USSR and Americans found that there spaceships were behaving irregularly. There ships were gaining extra speed and trajectory by almost 20%. So in plain white english these ships were pulling 20% performance out of nothing.

Why hasn't this been explained by NASA?. I have looked long and hard for more information but it always ends up in a dead end. A very interesting website i found ([crackpot link deleted]) explains what i did just there in more intensive detail.

I am asking for anyone with astrophysics, or just plain physics knowledge to explain this to me?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
This is just conspiracy theory and crackpottery. Nothing to explain.

It should be pretty obvious - the US isn't the only country to have sent an object into orbit. This isn't a piece of science that could be kept secret.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
9K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
7K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
488
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 124 ·
5
Replies
124
Views
18K