What is the shape of a mass vs. acceleration graph?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies the relationship between mass and acceleration in classical mechanics, emphasizing that when mass is constant, it does not depend on acceleration. Participants agree that plotting mass on the y-axis and acceleration on the x-axis results in a horizontal line, indicating that mass remains unchanged regardless of acceleration. The conversation also touches on the implications of special relativity, where mass is not constant and varies with velocity, as described by the equation M = m / √(1 - v²/c²).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's Second Law (F=ma)
  • Basic knowledge of graphing concepts in physics
  • Familiarity with the principles of special relativity
  • Concept of constant versus variable quantities in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of Newton's Second Law in various scenarios
  • Learn about graphing relationships in physics, specifically mass vs. acceleration
  • Explore the concept of relativistic mass and its effects on acceleration
  • Investigate the relationship between force, mass, and acceleration in different physical contexts
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and anyone interested in understanding the fundamental principles of mechanics and the effects of relativity on mass and acceleration.

liz777
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
The mass is constant, and there is a varying force. So would the mass be the dependent value(y-axis) and the acceleration be the independent value(x-axis)?

I think the mass is the dependent value so when I graphed it the line went straight across(horizontal). Is this right? I'm really confused because I thought acceleration was inversely proportional to mass, so it shouldn't be a linear relationship?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
liz777 said:
The mass is constant, and there is a varying force. So would the mass be the dependent value(y-axis) and the acceleration be the independent value(x-axis)?

I think the mass is the dependent value so when I graphed it the line went straight across(horizontal). Is this right? I'm really confused because I thought acceleration was inversely proportional to mass, so it shouldn't be a linear relationship?
You said yourself that the mass is constant. This means that for any point P(a,m) where a is acceleration and m is mass, you have the same y value (m) for any x value (a).

This is why you got a horizontal line when you graphed mass vs. acceleration; mass doesn't actually depend on the acceleration (in this case).
 
so we know F=ma right?
Then, if your mass is constant, then the value of mass doesn't change. Its a number like 7 or 8 or 9. TO graph mass vs acceleration is to say mass on the y-axis and acceleration on the X axis. So I think it should be something like a straight horizontal line like you said. This seems logical because your y-value that is mass stays constant but you acceleration changes, which is your x value. If this is what your graph depicts then it seems right. Cheers
 
Mathemagician said:
You said yourself that the mass is constant. This means that for any point P(a,m) where a is acceleration and m is mass, you have the same y value (m) for any x value (a).

This is why you got a horizontal line when you graphed mass vs. acceleration; mass doesn't actually depend on the acceleration (in this case).
as mass is constant, the acceleration is a function of force only i.e. acc is directly proportional to force applied. depending the magnitude of force the acc will change
 
devrana01 said:
as mass is constant, the acceleration is a function of force only i.e. acc is directly proportional to force applied. depending the magnitude of force the acc will change
The reason I said "in this case" was because in relativity, mass (or maybe more properly, momentum) is not constant with an increase in velocity.

In special relativity, the relation between mass and velocity is M=\frac{m}{\sqrt{1-\frac{v^2}{c^2}}.

Where M is the relativistic mass, and m is the rest mass. v is the velocity of the body, and c is the speed of light.

This obviously shows that M is NOT a constant.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
9K
Replies
44
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K