What is the significance of the diagonal line in Cobweb Diagrams?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mr.tea
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Diagrams
mr.tea
Messages
101
Reaction score
12
Hi,

I saw at the lecture something that called Cobweb diagram/plot and it was given without too much explanation. We were working on recursive sequences(Math major, first semester). The sequence was \frac{1}{2-\frac{1}{2-...}}

I tried to find an explanation to this diagram; why did we choose the diagonal line y=x, and why does it even say something(we could also choose y=2x or y=-3.5x, didn't we?)? I would like to know more why does this diagram even have some meaning.

Thanks,
Thomas
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
For recursive functions, I have seen something similar.
Essentially, you have a recursion formula like ##x_{n+1} = \frac{1}{(2 - x_n)}## with x_0 = 1/2.

You can see a detailed video and a plotting tool here: http://mathinsight.org/cobwebbing_graphical_solution
 
This method reminds me of fixed points. That is, the search for a value a, such that f(a) = a. This is why the reference line in the spider web in y=x, because for each iteration, you are not only using the line y=x as a reference line to help you bring f(x_n) back to your x-axis to use it as x_{n+1}, but you will also notice for most limited systems, the plots will converge to the fixed point.
In this case, if you solve for the fixed point where x = 1/(2-x), you will get x^2 -2x +1 = 0, or x = 1.
 
  • Like
Likes mr.tea
Yes, the concept of "fixed point" is what you need. If you have the recursion x_{n+1}= \frac{1}{2- x_n}, x_0= 1/2 we can, temporarily, assume that this sequence has a limit. If that is true then taking the limit, x, on both sides, x= \frac{1}{2- x} so that x(2- x)= 2x- x^2= 1 or x^2- 2x+ 1= 0, the equation RUber gives. Once you know the putative limit, you can use that information to prove that the sequence does in fact converge.

Here, for example, it is not difficult to prove, by induction, that the sequence is increasing and bounded above by 1 so converges.
 
  • Like
Likes mr.tea
Thank you both HallsofIvy and RUber.

As you said HallsofIvy, the concept of "fixed point" is probably what I need. I can find the limit without the diagram(with the theorem of increasing sequence and bounded above + induction), but this is a nice another point of view on the problem and I would like to know more about it.

What is the importance of "fixed point"? what its contribution for the study of functions?

RUber, I have already seen this very video, but he does not explain why he does that, just how to draw the diagram(I already know to draw the diagram and finding the limit).

Thank you again!
Thomas
 
A fixed point is one where f(x)=x. So in an inductive process, you would have x_{n+1} = x_n, and that would then hold true for all future iterations. It is exactly this reason which makes using y=x as the reference line for the spiderweb plot make sense.
There are other proofs for transformations on spaces that talk about how only this in more general terms, but for most functional forms, as long as you choose an appropriate initial value you will approach a fixed point if one exists through iteration.
 
  • Like
Likes mr.tea
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top