MHB What is the solution (rational function/interval table)?

  • Thread starter Thread starter eleventhxhour
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Table
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving the inequality |x/(x-2)| < 5. Participants explore methods to eliminate the absolute value, including squaring both sides and splitting the inequality into two separate cases. Confusion arises regarding the correct intervals for x, with one participant obtaining x < 5/3 and x > 2, while the book states x < 5/3 and x > 5/2. The importance of understanding the sign of terms when cross-multiplying in inequalities is emphasized. Ultimately, the correct solution involves ensuring both conditions for x are satisfied, leading to the final intervals.
eleventhxhour
Messages
73
Reaction score
0
What is the solution of |x/(x-2)| < 5 ?

So, I did this the usual way of moving over the 5 to the left side and then cross multiplying and simplifying etc. However, I keep getting the wrong answer. I got x < 5/3 and x > 2, while the answer in the book says that it's x< 5/3 and x > 5/2.

What did I do wrong? I'm assuming it has something to do with the absolute value sign, but I'm not sure how to figure it out...
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
What do yo mean with cross multiplying? I'm not familiar with this.

I would solve it this way: to get rid of the absolut value signs you can square both sides, that is

$$\left | \frac{x}{x-2}\right | < 5 \Rightarrow \frac{x^2}{(x-2)^2} < 25$$
Solving this inequality gives the desired result.
 
Another way to get rid of the absolute value:
[math]\left | \frac{x}{x - 2} \right | < 5[/math]

splits into the two inequalities:
[math]\frac{x}{x - 2} < 5[/math]

and
[math]-\frac{x}{x - 2} < 5[/math]

and solve them separately.

The trouble with cross multiplying when using inequalities is that we need to know the sign of what we are multiplying by. For example -4/x < 1 when x is positive, but -4/x > 1 when x is negative. The same thing will occur for the x - 2 term.

-Dan
 
topsquark said:
Another way to get rid of the absolute value:
[math]\left | \frac{x}{x - 2} \right | < 5[/math]

splits into the two inequalities:
[math]\frac{x}{x - 2} < 5[/math]

and
[math]-\frac{x}{x - 2} < 5[/math]

and solve them separately.

The trouble with cross multiplying when using inequalities is that we need to know the sign of what we are multiplying by. For example -4/x < 1 when x is positive, but -4/x > 1 when x is negative. The same thing will occur for the x - 2 term.

-Dan

So I solved each of those and for the first one I got that it's negative at x<2 and x>5/2. For the second I got that it's negative at x<5/3 and x>2. Is this correct? The book had a different answer (x<5/3 and x>5/2).
 
eleventhxhour said:
So I solved each of those and for the first one I got that it's negative at x<2 and x>5/2. For the second I got that it's negative at x<5/3 and x>2. Is this correct? The book had a different answer (x<5/3 and x>5/2).
All of this has to come together. Take a look first at the lower limits of x. We have x < 2 and x < 5/3. In order for both of these to be true then we require that x < 5/3, because 5/3 is smaller than 2...both conditions are satisfied by this. See if you can do the upper limits of x based on a similar argument.

-Dan
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
51
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Back
Top