What is the Solution to a Confusing Circular Motion Problem?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a circular motion problem involving tension and acceleration. Participants emphasize the importance of drawing free-body diagrams to analyze the forces acting on each mass, specifically noting the roles of tangential and centripetal accelerations. It is clarified that only radial tensions are present, resulting in no tangential acceleration. The tension equations for each segment of the string are established, leading to a solution for the problem. Ultimately, the problem is resolved, and the participant expresses gratitude for the assistance received.
thunderhadron
Messages
140
Reaction score
0
The problem is as such :



Attempt to the problem:



The answer is confusing Option D

Thank you all in advance.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Tension is a force and force is related to acceleration via Newton's 2nd law. How do you determine the acceleration of a particle moving in a circle at constant angular speed ##\omega##?

Draw free-body diagrams for each mass. You need to consider the NET force acting on each particle.
 
TSny said:
Draw free-body diagrams for each mass. You need to consider the NET force acting on each particle.

But friend how could it be done without knowing the separations.

If we draw the free body diagram there would be two accelerations - tangential aT and centripetal aR

aR will be along the thread and it will equate the tension. Isn't it?
 
TSny said:
Draw free-body diagrams for each mass. You need to consider the NET force acting on each particle.


 
Last edited by a moderator:
thunderhadron said:
If we draw the free body diagram there would be two accelerations - tangential aT and centripetal aR

Since the only forces acting on the particles are tensions which are radial ,there will be no tangential acceleration.

The FBD in the above post#4 is incorrect.

Let the tension in the string OA be T1,AB be T2 and BC be T3.The length of each string segment be l.

Now for A, T1-T2=mv12/l

For B ,T2-T3=mv22/2l

Similarly you can write eq for C.

From this you will get the desired ratio.
 
Thank you very much friends. I got the answer. Problem has been cleared.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top