What is the solution to this separable differential equation?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a separable differential equation presented in the form (x+y-4)dy - (2x-y+1)dx = 0. Participants are attempting to clarify the correct formulation and integration approach for solving the equation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants question the original poster's integration method, particularly regarding the treatment of variables as constants. There are discussions about the correct interpretation of the differential equation and whether it can be separated. Some suggest considering the equation as exact and finding a function F(x,y) that satisfies the conditions of the equation.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with multiple interpretations being explored. Participants are providing guidance on the integration process and questioning the assumptions made in the original attempt. There is no explicit consensus on the correct approach yet.

Contextual Notes

There is confusion regarding the treatment of variables during integration, particularly whether x can be treated as a constant. Participants are also addressing the necessity of correctly identifying the form of the differential equation for proper solution methods.

Dao Tuat
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Solve the following differential equation


Homework Equations


(x+y-4)dy - (2x-y+1)dy = 0

EDIT: Oops, it should be (x+y-4)dy - (2x-y+1)dx = 0

The Attempt at a Solution


I integrated both sides and ended up with:
[y(2x +y-8)]/2 = X^2 + x(1-y) + c

Did I solve this right, or am I supposed to do something else?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
First of all: Which "dy" should be a "dx" instead??

Secondly, you have probably done this incorrectly by fallaciously regarding "x" and "y" as constants in the integration on both sides. This is wrong.
 
Did you mean [tex]\left( {x + y - 4} \right)dy - \left( {2x - y + 1} \right)dx = 0[/tex]? If so then you have neglected some products.

On the left, [tex]\int {xdy} \ne xy[/tex] and similarly on the right.
 
If it is, in fact, (x+y-4)dy - (2x-y+1)dy = 0
which is the same as (x+y-4)dy + (-2x+y-1)dy = 0, then it
is an "exact" equation: (x+y-4)x= 1= (-2x+y-1)y.
There exist a function F(x,y) such that dF= (x+y-4)dy - (2x-y+1)dy = 0 and so F(x,y) is a constant. Do you know how to find that F?
 
Aero said:
On the left, [tex]\int {xdy} \ne xy[/tex] and similarly on the right.

Isn't it? It's off by a constant, but that's it unless I'm crazy.
 
d_leet said:
Isn't it? It's off by a constant, but that's it unless I'm crazy.

No, because x is not a constant. Consider d(xy). Because x is not a constant this is not just xdy.
 
Thanks for everyones help. I'm still a bit confused though. Any tips would be very much appreciated.
 
Aero said:
No, because x is not a constant. Consider d(xy). Because x is not a constant this is not just xdy.

You are integrating with respect to y, however, so as it is written above that will be equal to xy+c, since when you integrate with respect to y you would treat x as a constant.
 
d_leet said:
You are integrating with respect to y, however, so as it is written above that will be equal to xy+c, since when you integrate with respect to y you would treat x as a constant.

But when you differentiate with respect to y, you get

d/dy (xy) = x + y * dx/dy

and x is not treated as a constant, so why should it be treated as a constant in integration?
 
  • #10
Aero said:
But when you differentiate with respect to y, you get

d/dy (xy) = x + y * dx/dy

and x is not treated as a constant, so why should it be treated as a constant in integration?

If you had differentiated correctly there would be no problem. You differentiated with respect to x even though you wrote it as you were going to differentiate with respect to y. If you differentiate xy with respect to y, you treat x as a constant because you are not differentiating with respect to it, hence the derivative of xy with respect to y is simply x.
 
  • #11
You cannot simply treat x as a constant in the term (x+y-4)dy and integrate it wrt y, since it is part of the differential equation. An equation can only be solved like that if it is separable into the form f(x)dx = g(y)dy, in which case both sides can be integrated. However, this equation cannot be separated into that form.

On how to solve this equation... I'm stumped!
 
  • #12
as aero suggested, consider d(xy)=xdy+ydx
 
  • #13
d_leet said:
If you had differentiated correctly there would be no problem. You differentiated with respect to x even though you wrote it as you were going to differentiate with respect to y. If you differentiate xy with respect to y, you treat x as a constant because you are not differentiating with respect to it, hence the derivative of xy with respect to y is simply x.

This is only true for partial differentiation. However, here we are dealing with normal differentiation and integration.

By your logic, d/dy (x) = 0 because you would treat x like a constant. But this is plain wrong: d/dy (x) = dx/dy.
 
Last edited:
  • #14
We have had 4 people pointing out that d_leet was wrong. Dao Tuat, have you looked at my response. Can you answer my question?

This is a "separable" differential equation. There must exist a function F(x,y) such that [itex]\frac{\partial F}{\partial x}= y- 2x- 1[/itex] and [itex]\frac{\partial F}{\partial y}= x+ y- 4[/itex]. Can you find F?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K