What is the structure of an H-decomposable graph?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Robb
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of H-decomposable graphs in graph theory. Participants are exploring the definition and structure of such graphs, particularly focusing on the role of the subgraph H and its relationship to the decomposition of a graph G.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to clarify the definition of H-decomposable graphs, expressing confusion about the nature of H and its subgraphs. Other participants provide alternative definitions and suggest that G is partitioned into subsets of edges, questioning the implications of this structure.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the definitions and exploring different interpretations of H-decomposition. Some guidance is offered on constructing examples of graphs, but no consensus has been reached regarding the precise understanding of the concept.

Contextual Notes

There are references to external definitions that appear to differ from the original poster's understanding, indicating potential gaps in information or assumptions about the structure of H-decomposable graphs.

Robb
Messages
225
Reaction score
8
Homework Statement
Show that if a graph G of size m contains a subgraph H of size m' where m' divides m, then G need not be decomposable.
Relevant Equations
N/A
Can someone please explain H-decomposable graphs. I understand that if all the subgraphs ##H_1, H_2, ..., H_k## are isomorphic to the same graph H, then G is H-decomposable. What I don't understand is, what is H? I'm reading this as there is a subgraph H, that contains a family of subgraphs ##H_1, H_2, ..., H_k##, which doesn't make sense to me. I thought the subgraphs ##H_1, H_2, ..., H_k## were the decomposition of G. Please advise.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Here is an abstract with a definition of H-decomposition: https://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=24522. It looks different than what you have stated. In this definition, graph G is partitioned into subsets of the edges, such that each subset is isomorphic to H or contains a single edge. So every node either has only one edge, or is in one and only one subgraph isomorphic to H. The union of these subgraphs and the single edges is G. This leaves open the possibilities of isolated pairs of nodes connected by a single edge and nodes with a single edge connected to an H graph.
 
Last edited:
tnich said:
Here is an abstract with a definition of H-decomposition: https://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=24522. It looks different than what you have stated. In this definition, graph G is partitioned into subsets of the edges, such that each subset is isomorphic to H or contains a single edge. So every node either has only one edge, or is in one and only one subgraph isomorphic to H. The union of these subgraphs and the single edges is G. This leaves open the possibilities of isolated pairs of nodes connected by a single edge and nodes with a single edge connected to an H graph.

Thanks, I don't suppose you would have an example of the graphs G and H, and possibly the partitions?
 
I don't, but you could construct them yourself. Draw a graph H. It can be any graph - large, small, highly connected or not. Draw a few copies of it. Pick a pair of the H graphs and draw an edge between a node in one and a node in the other. Repeat for another pair of H graphs. You can keep this up until the final graph is connected, or not. If you want you could also add a node connected to one H group with an edge, or a pair of nodes connected with an edge but not connected to anything else.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Robb
tnich said:
I don't, but you could construct them yourself. Draw a graph H. It can be any graph - large, small, highly connected or not. Draw a few copies of it. Pick a pair of the H graphs and draw an edge between a node in one and a node in the other. Repeat for another pair of H graphs. You can keep this up until the final graph is connected, or not. If you want you could also add a node connected to one H group with an edge, or a pair of nodes connected with an edge but not connected to anything else.
THanks
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K